can we just get some clarity on what's going on here? like, the news distortion policy has been around since the 60s and only got one finding of distortion after 82... that's already pretty chill
but now it's being used as leverage against broadcasters who are supposedly biased? sounds like a big ol' mess 
i mean, i get where carr is coming from, trying to hold people accountable for their bias and all that. but at the same time, shouldn't we be worried about the fcc overstepping its bounds and stifling free speech?
like, aren't journalists supposed to be able to report on whatever they want without fear of reprisal?
and what's with the bipartisan group of former FCC leaders just criticizing carr for taking a stance that i think is actually pretty reasonable? shouldn't we be having a more nuanced conversation about this stuff?
i mean, i get where carr is coming from, trying to hold people accountable for their bias and all that. but at the same time, shouldn't we be worried about the fcc overstepping its bounds and stifling free speech?
and what's with the bipartisan group of former FCC leaders just criticizing carr for taking a stance that i think is actually pretty reasonable? shouldn't we be having a more nuanced conversation about this stuff?