WNBA Players, League Hit Roadblock in Collective Bargaining Agreement Talks
The WNBA and its players' union were unable to reach a new collective bargaining agreement (CBA) by Friday night's deadline, sending the league into a "status-quo" period without a new extension. Negotiations will continue with the current CBA still in effect, but it appears the two sides remain far apart on key issues such as salary structure and revenue-sharing.
The WNBA had offered a proposal last month that would guarantee a maximum base salary of $1 million for players by 2026, potentially reaching up to $2 million over the life of the agreement. However, the union has expressed concerns that the league's offer undervalues player contributions and dismisses their concerns.
"We're willing to work together, but we need to see a more serious effort from the WNBA," said the players' union in a statement. "Instead, they seem committed to running out the clock."
If a new CBA is not reached soon, it could delay the start of the 2026 season. The league has told its teams that they can send out qualifying offers to free agents starting on Sunday, but without a clear understanding of the new salary structure and cap, no teams are expected to make those offers.
Under the proposed revenue-sharing model, players would receive more than 70% of net revenue after expenses are paid. However, the union has countered with its own proposal that would give players around 30% of gross revenue, increasing slightly each year.
The dispute over revenue sharing is a significant sticking point in the negotiations, and both sides seem committed to their positions. The league's offer would provide for a minimum salary growth from $120,000 to approximately $250,000, while the union seeks higher increases.
As the WNBA continues to experience unprecedented popularity and growth, the players' union emphasizes the importance of a deal that significantly increases player salaries and enhances the overall player experience. However, it appears that the league's offer may not meet their demands, leaving the negotiations in limbo.
The WNBA and its players' union were unable to reach a new collective bargaining agreement (CBA) by Friday night's deadline, sending the league into a "status-quo" period without a new extension. Negotiations will continue with the current CBA still in effect, but it appears the two sides remain far apart on key issues such as salary structure and revenue-sharing.
The WNBA had offered a proposal last month that would guarantee a maximum base salary of $1 million for players by 2026, potentially reaching up to $2 million over the life of the agreement. However, the union has expressed concerns that the league's offer undervalues player contributions and dismisses their concerns.
"We're willing to work together, but we need to see a more serious effort from the WNBA," said the players' union in a statement. "Instead, they seem committed to running out the clock."
If a new CBA is not reached soon, it could delay the start of the 2026 season. The league has told its teams that they can send out qualifying offers to free agents starting on Sunday, but without a clear understanding of the new salary structure and cap, no teams are expected to make those offers.
Under the proposed revenue-sharing model, players would receive more than 70% of net revenue after expenses are paid. However, the union has countered with its own proposal that would give players around 30% of gross revenue, increasing slightly each year.
The dispute over revenue sharing is a significant sticking point in the negotiations, and both sides seem committed to their positions. The league's offer would provide for a minimum salary growth from $120,000 to approximately $250,000, while the union seeks higher increases.
As the WNBA continues to experience unprecedented popularity and growth, the players' union emphasizes the importance of a deal that significantly increases player salaries and enhances the overall player experience. However, it appears that the league's offer may not meet their demands, leaving the negotiations in limbo.