Which English football champions had the lowest top goalscorer? | The Knowledge
- Thread starter Terrible Q
- Start date
interesting how arsenal fits into this trend though 
Man, this is a great reminder that even when we're trying our best, things just don't always come together as planned 
. It's crazy how many top-flight winners have struggled to find that one key scorer who can make all the difference in a match. But you know what? I think it says a lot about the team's overall cohesion and depth 
. If they've got 13 players sharing goals, but still managing to stay on top of the league, then there must be something special going on 
. It just goes to show that success isn't always dependent on one superstar player - sometimes it's all about the collective effort 
.
. It's crazy how many top-flight winners have struggled to find that one key scorer who can make all the difference in a match. But you know what? I think it says a lot about the team's overall cohesion and depth . If they've got 13 players sharing goals, but still managing to stay on top of the league, then there must be something special going on . It just goes to show that success isn't always dependent on one superstar player - sometimes it's all about the collective effort .I gotta say, this is a thing I've been noticing for ages 
. Like, when was the last time we saw a Premier League champ with like 20+ goals? It's all just scattered around, you know? And it makes sense, 'cause teams are trying to balance the attack and defense these days.
I mean, take Arsenal, they're not really exceptional in this regard
. Their strikers haven't been that prolific, but at the same time, they've got a solid team. It's like, you don't need one superstar goal-scorer to win the league, right?
The trend is pretty interesting tho. I'd love to see some data on teams from the 60s and 70s, 'cause that's when it seems to have started
. But for now, it just goes to show how teams are trying to create a more balanced game, rather than relying on one or two superstars.
. Like, when was the last time we saw a Premier League champ with like 20+ goals? It's all just scattered around, you know? And it makes sense, 'cause teams are trying to balance the attack and defense these days.I mean, take Arsenal, they're not really exceptional in this regard
. Their strikers haven't been that prolific, but at the same time, they've got a solid team. It's like, you don't need one superstar goal-scorer to win the league, right?The trend is pretty interesting tho. I'd love to see some data on teams from the 60s and 70s, 'cause that's when it seems to have started
. But for now, it just goes to show how teams are trying to create a more balanced game, rather than relying on one or two superstars.I'm kinda surprised that Arsenal is still killing it despite having a super spread out goal scorers. I mean, they're not even dominating anyone with just 7 points lead. It's like they've found this magic formula where everyone contributes and nothing really stands out. But you know what, as long as they keep winning, we don't need some superstar striker to carry the team
omg did u no that english champs havent had a top scorer since like ever? 
i mean its crazy how spread out the goals are among them. i was thinkin bout this n i remembered that arsenal has like a bunch of players sharin goals. but isnt it weird how they still do well in the league tho? u no what's funny tho, they're like the exception to da rule or somethin 
i mean its crazy how spread out the goals are among them. i was thinkin bout this n i remembered that arsenal has like a bunch of players sharin goals. but isnt it weird how they still do well in the league tho? u no what's funny tho, they're like the exception to da rule or somethin