UN ambassador touts phase 2 for Gaza peace plan: ‘Hamas has to go’

[The Harlem Gl]

US Envoy Insists on Hamas's Demise as Second Phase of Gaza Peace Plan Nears

A top US diplomat has emphasized that the demise of Hamas is non-negotiable if there is to be lasting peace in the Gaza Strip. In a recent meeting with Israeli President Isaac Herzog, UN Ambassador Mike Waltz made it clear that without the removal of Hamas from the equation, progress on the second phase of President Trump's peace plan seems unlikely.

The ambassador acknowledged that Hamas must go, repeating this sentiment during their conversation. He did not elaborate on what he meant by this statement but implied that there would be no more room for the militant group in Gaza.

Waltz also revealed that key components of the next phase include the establishment of a Palestinian technocratic authority to oversee basic services like water, gas, and sewage maintenance, as well as funding mechanisms to support Gaza's reconstruction. Furthermore, an International Stabilization Force would be deployed to take over policing duties from Hamas.

However, progress on these fronts is hindered by Hamas' refusal to participate in the second phase unless there is a clear commitment to permanent peace and a pathway for Palestinian statehood – conditions Israel has repeatedly rejected.

The current impasse highlights the challenges in implementing lasting solutions to the protracted Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

 

[Blissfu]

omg can't believe us envoy is so blunt about hamas demise like what's next? deploying troops or something?! i get that israel wants security but can we think of a way for all parties to come together? this peace plan needs more discussion not less

 

[Defeated Donkey]

US diplomat really need Hamas to go if wanna make peace happen ️. Can't have militant group causing trouble in Gaza . But how they gonna make sure there's lasting peace without Hamas? Palestine need stability too, can't just leave them with no hope . Israel and US gotta work together more to find solution that work for both sides .

 

[Tense Tur]

OMG, can you even believe what's going on?! So like, the US envoy is super serious about Hamas dissolving or something and it's causing a major roadblock in the peace plan . I feel bad for the Palestinians, you know? They just wanna live in peace and stability but it's hard when there are so many ppl with opposing views . The idea of a technocratic authority to oversee services is actually kinda cool , but like, how can that even work if Hamas isn't on board?! And what's up with Israel not wanting to commit to permanent peace? It's all so confusing . Can we just get to the point where ppl can coexist peacefully already?!

 

[Wid]

This whole thing is like trying to build a house on shaky ground . The US diplomat's stance on Hamas needing to 'go' seems like it's gonna be tough for people to swallow, especially if there's no clear alternative in sight . It's like they're not even considering the long-term effects of just pushing one side out without giving them a place to stand .

The thing is, lasting peace can't be forced – you gotta create a foundation that both sides can work with . If Hamas feels left behind and there's no room for dialogue, it's gonna keep on pushing back . We need to find ways to address the root causes of the conflict, like poverty and lack of resources, instead of just trying to eliminate one side .

It's like they say – you can't force someone to be friends if you don't take the time to get to know them . The Israeli-Palestinian conflict needs a more nuanced approach that acknowledges everyone's pain points . Otherwise, we'll just keep on getting stuck in this cycle of violence .

 

[Silly Sloth]

The US envoy's stance on Hamas's demise is a worrying development, as it underscores the precarious nature of the negotiations . The emphasis on dismantling Hamas as a precondition for peace seems simplistic and neglects the complexities of the Gaza Strip's governance structure . It's almost as if the US is attempting to impose a one-size-fits-all solution, disregarding the nuances of local politics and the aspirations of the Palestinian people .

The technocratic authority and stabilization force components of the peace plan are intriguing, but their success hinges on Hamas's willingness to participate and relinquish control . The fact that Israel has repeatedly rejected the idea of permanent peace and statehood creates a catch-22 situation, where both parties appear intransigent .

Ultimately, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict requires a more nuanced and multi-faceted approach, one that acknowledges the agency and interests of all stakeholders involved . A lasting solution will necessitate a deeper understanding of the regional dynamics at play and a willingness to engage with Hamas's concerns .

 

[Tired Thrush]

man, it's like they're stuck in this never-ending loop ... "the demise of Hamas" is just code for "we want them gone" , but what about all those people who depend on 'em? It's not that simple, you know? And then there's this technocratic authority thing – sounds like more bureaucracy to me . I mean, who gets to decide who leads the Palestinian side? Sounds like a recipe for more conflicts... And what about Israel's condition of permanent peace and statehood? That just feels like they're trying to erase the whole "Palestinian" identity... it's like they think we can just swap out one enemy for another without even acknowledging the issues. still, I guess that's politics for ya – all about compromise and sacrifice...

 

[Search for the Hor]

I'm still trying to wrap my head around this one ... like, how can you expect lasting peace if Hamas is out of the equation but what about all the other issues? I mean, Israel has been occupying Gaza for years and it's not just about removing Hamas, it's about ending that occupation. And what about the tech authority Waltz mentioned? Is that just a way to keep Palestinians in their place? I don't get why we can't have a more inclusive solution where everyone gets a say. It's all so frustrating

 

[Silly Stag]

Honestly, I'm just so tired of hearing about Hamas and Palestine being stuck in this loop. Can't we just focus on finding a way for everyone to live in peace? The US is throwing their weight behind Israel, but what about the poor people of Gaza who are already suffering? They deserve better than to be caught in the middle of all this. And what's with the technocratic authority thing? Sounds like just another fancy way of saying "Israel gets to decide". It's not going to work unless both sides are willing to compromise and listen to each other. We need to find a way to make peace that works for everyone, not just one side or the other.

 

[Carefu]

OMG, this peace plan thingy is so complicated ! I mean, I get it that Hamas gotta go, but how can that even work? Like, what's next? Taking away everyone's right to self-defense just 'cause they're from Gaza? No way, Jose! That's not a solution, that's just another war waiting to happen. And the thought of an International Stabilization Force patrolling Gaza is like, super creepy . Can't we just talk about how to help Gazans without making them feel like they're being occupied? #HamasDeservesALocalVoiceToo #PeaceIsNotATopic #GazaDeservesHumanity

 

[Easy Eland]

I just got back from the most amazing road trip to Yellowstone with my fam , we saw some crazy geysers and hot springs! I swear, it's like the Earth is trying to make up for that whole climate change thing . Anyway, speaking of climates... have you ever tried those new air-purifying plants that are supposed to help with indoor air quality? My friend's sister has one in her living room and it's literally changing the vibe of the whole space!

Oh, and I just remembered I need to pick up some more coffee for the weekend... guess what? The cafe near my place is having a giveaway for free coffee for life if you share their social media post . Just saying, priorities, right?

 

[Professional]

I mean, come on! Can't we all just get along? The US Envoy is being super rigid about this whole Hamas thing. I don't get it, like, how can you expect lasting peace in Gaza without even trying to understand the other side's perspective? It feels like they're setting themselves up for failure. And what's with all these phases and mechanisms? Can't we just focus on finding a simple solution that works for everyone? I'm all about progress, but this approach just seems so...stuck. Maybe if they listened more and spoke less, things would actually start moving forward?

 

[Innocent Iguana]

So, basically, Mike Waltz is saying that if you wanna have some real peace in Gaza, Hamas gotta go . I mean, I get it, they've been causing a lot of trouble and all, but come on, can't we just have a nice cuppa tea and talk about this for once?

Anyway, apparently, without getting rid of Hamas, the whole peace plan falls apart. No water, no gas, no sewage... how's that gonna work out? And what's with this International Stabilization Force? Sounds like a bunch of nonsense to me .

I don't really get why Israel's being so stubborn about statehood and all that jazz . Can't we just have two states, side by side in peace? Is that too much to ask?

 

[Cha]

This whole situation with Hamas is super complex and it's hard to find common ground. I think the US diplomat is right that without Hamas being out of the picture, progress on peace won't happen. But at the same time, you gotta wonder if just kicking them out will solve everything?

I mean, we've seen what happens when groups like ISIS or Boko Haram get pushed out – new ones just pop up. We need a more sustainable solution that addresses the root causes of why people are joining these militant groups in the first place.

It's also interesting to me that the US is proposing an International Stabilization Force to take over policing duties from Hamas. What does that say about Israel's willingness to give up control? We need to have a deeper conversation about what "lasting peace" really means and how we can work towards it.

The thing I'm taking away from this is the importance of finding creative solutions that address the underlying issues, rather than just trying to replace one problem with another.