UK PM's Chief of Staff Quits Over Mandyson's Ties to Epstein, Damaging Labour Party and Trust in Politics.
In a shocking move, the UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney has quit over the appointment of Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the US. The decision comes after files revealed the extent of Mandelson's relationship with late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, raising serious questions about the Labour Party and its handling of sensitive information.
McSweeney took full responsibility for advising the Prime Minister on the appointment, saying that he had "advised the Prime Minister to make that appointment". However, he also acknowledged that he had failed to ensure proper background checks were conducted before Mandelson was appointed. This criticism has been echoed by some Labour members of parliament who blamed McSweeney for the damage caused by the publication of crude exchanges between him and Epstein.
The scandal has sparked a wave of controversy within the Labour Party, with some lawmakers calling for McSweeney's resignation over the appointment of Mandelson. The departure of McSweeney has thrown the future direction of the government into doubt, less than two years after the party won one of the largest parliamentary majorities in modern British history.
Mandelson was sacked by Starmer in September due to his friendship with Epstein and last week also quit the Labour Party and House of Lords. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office is reviewing an exit payment made to him after he was fired, which has been estimated to be between $52,000 and $74,000.
As the scandal continues to unfold, Starmer's political future remains under scrutiny. With polls showing that the Prime Minister is already hugely unpopular with voters, some in his own party are openly questioning his judgment and future. However, a close ally of the Prime Minister has defended him, saying that he should remain in office despite his "terrible mistake" in appointing Mandelson.
The close Starmer ally told broadcasters that the party should stick with the Prime Minister, but it remains to be seen whether this will be enough to silence his critics. The departure of McSweeney has marked a significant turning point for the Labour Party, and its ability to recover from this scandal will be closely watched by voters and observers alike.
In a shocking move, the UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney has quit over the appointment of Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the US. The decision comes after files revealed the extent of Mandelson's relationship with late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, raising serious questions about the Labour Party and its handling of sensitive information.
McSweeney took full responsibility for advising the Prime Minister on the appointment, saying that he had "advised the Prime Minister to make that appointment". However, he also acknowledged that he had failed to ensure proper background checks were conducted before Mandelson was appointed. This criticism has been echoed by some Labour members of parliament who blamed McSweeney for the damage caused by the publication of crude exchanges between him and Epstein.
The scandal has sparked a wave of controversy within the Labour Party, with some lawmakers calling for McSweeney's resignation over the appointment of Mandelson. The departure of McSweeney has thrown the future direction of the government into doubt, less than two years after the party won one of the largest parliamentary majorities in modern British history.
Mandelson was sacked by Starmer in September due to his friendship with Epstein and last week also quit the Labour Party and House of Lords. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office is reviewing an exit payment made to him after he was fired, which has been estimated to be between $52,000 and $74,000.
As the scandal continues to unfold, Starmer's political future remains under scrutiny. With polls showing that the Prime Minister is already hugely unpopular with voters, some in his own party are openly questioning his judgment and future. However, a close ally of the Prime Minister has defended him, saying that he should remain in office despite his "terrible mistake" in appointing Mandelson.
The close Starmer ally told broadcasters that the party should stick with the Prime Minister, but it remains to be seen whether this will be enough to silence his critics. The departure of McSweeney has marked a significant turning point for the Labour Party, and its ability to recover from this scandal will be closely watched by voters and observers alike.
they're already questioning starmer's future and now mcsweeney's gone it's like they knew something was fishy but didn't wanna rock the boat all because of mandelson's ties to epstein who knows what else he's hiding behind that smile meanwhile, the party's already losing trust and their largest majority is still fresh... poor timing for starmer 
i mean, who makes friends with pedophiles? it's like they think they can just sweep it under the rug and expect everything to be okay again. newsflash: it's not that easy. morgan mcswency should've done his job better, but the bigger question is why did keir starmer appoint mandelson in the first place? was it politics over principle?
. gotta wonder what's gonna happen to starmer now, not looking good for him at all... 2 yrs ago he won a landslide, now his gov't's in doubt 
. i hope they do some serious background checks before makin new appointments lol. starmer needs to prove himself again or else hes outta office 
. anyway, 45% of british voters think starmer should resign over this scandal 
. and btw, have you seen the graph showing how labour's popularity has been trending downward since the last election? it's pretty dramatic 
. The party needs some serious shake-up to restore trust with voters and get rid of this toxic scandal once and for all 
this is like such a huge mess for the lab party now mcsweeney just quit over mandelson's ties to epstein i mean whats going on with these ppl?! i'm all about keir starmer 2 be honest he should get the benefit of the doubt 1 mistake does not define him, r u kidding me if anyone else wouldve gotten away with this kind of thing they'd be toast lol what's the lab party gonna do now?
, you know? And now the whole thing is affecting Starmer's team and the party as a whole 
. I'm not sure if it's just bad luck or what... but it feels like this scandal was coming for them 
. I mean, come on, Peter Mandelson? He's got some serious skeletons in his closet 
. It's like the Labour Party just wanted to sweep it under the rug and hope no one noticed 
. But now McSweeney's outta there, and that's just gonna make things worse 
. It's all just a big mess right now, and it's hard to see how they're gonna get out of this one 
. The fact that Keir Starmer appointed him in the first place is just crazy talk 
.
.
. Can't these guys get it together?
. The Labour Party needs to get its act together and be more transparent about their vetting process... can't just let anyone slide into key positions without doing proper checks 
. And what's up with the exit payment to Mandelson? $52,000 to $74,000 for quiting? That's just laughable 
. The PM's already got a lot on his plate, and now this scandal is just going to make things worse 
.
. The PM's future hangs in the balance, but it's hard to see how he can bounce back from this mess 
. And what's even more concerning is how the party handled it all... or didn't handle it, depending on how you look at it 
. I'm not sure if McSweeney taking responsibility helps, but at least he's owning up to it 
.
where are the sources on this? I want to see some concrete evidence before I start jumping to conclusions.