U.S. Rep. Thanedar introduces articles of impeachment against Attorney General - Detroit Metro Times

Michigan Congressman Shri Thanedar has announced plans to introduce articles of impeachment against Attorney General Pam Bondi, marking the latest attempt by a Democrat to take action against a Trump-era official. The move comes as Thanedar seeks reelection in a district that has remained safely Democratic.

Thanedar's criticism of Bondi centers on her alleged disregard for congressional oversight and her apparent loyalty to former President Donald Trump. He claims she defied a congressional mandate to release files tied to Jeffrey Epstein, abused her authority to pressure Minnesota for voter registration rolls, and "weaponized" the Justice Department to target Trump critics.

"The Department of Justice's role is to uphold the rule of law impartially and protect the American people," Thanedar said in a statement. "But time and time again, Attorney General Pam Bondi has placed her loyalty to President Trump over her constitutional duty. From illegally withholding the Epstein files past the required deadline, to trying to coerce Minnesota into turning over its state voter files, to weaponizing the Department of Justice against Donald Trump's political opponents, she has disgraced the office she holds."

Thanedar's latest impeachment push targets an attorney general with a polarizing record. Bondi has drawn criticism for spreading false claims about widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election and for her long-standing ties to Trump.

The announcement follows two recent impeachment pushes by Thaneder that failed to gain traction. In December, he filed articles of impeachment against U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, accusing him of issuing unlawful military orders and mishandling classified information. No vote has been taken.

In April, Thanedar introduced seven articles of impeachment against Trump, alleging corruption, obstruction of justice, and other misconduct. Democratic leadership discouraged the effort, and Thanedar ultimately backed away from forcing a vote on the House floor.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has made clear that impeachment efforts against members of the Trump administration are effectively dead on arrival in a Republican-controlled chamber. Republicans have signaled they will not allow articles of impeachment to be brought to the floor.

Thanedar is also running for reelection this year, facing four other Democrats in the August primary. His latest push targets an attorney general with a record that has drawn criticism from both Democrats and Republicans.
 
I think it's crazy how polarized politics are in the US right now 😳. It feels like everyone wants to take down their opponents, whether it's a Democrat trying to go after a Trump-era official or a Republican not even giving them a chance πŸ™„. It's all so toxic and it's hard to see how this is going to improve anything.

And can we talk about Pam Bondi for a second? She's definitely got a lot of critics, but I'm not sure if impeaching her is the best way forward πŸ€”. Wouldn't it be better to just focus on holding people accountable through regular oversight and investigations? Instead of trying to take them down with impeachment proceedings.

It feels like we're living in this world where everyone's just trying to get revenge, rather than working together to find common ground πŸ’‘. And it's making me wonder if the US is really moving forward as a country πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ.
 
πŸ€” I'm not buying it πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. Another Democrat trying to take down a Trump-era official without any real evidence πŸ‘€. Pam Bondi's actions seem pretty shady, but have we seen the full context of these alleged oversights? What about the timing of all this? Is Thanedar just trying to boost his reelection campaign by making a big splash? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ I need to see some concrete proof before I start jumping on the impeachment bandwagon πŸš‚. And let's be real, Republicans aren't going to let these articles fly without a fight πŸ˜‚. It's all about politics and power plays πŸ€‘. Can we just get to the bottom of things and have a real conversation? πŸ’¬
 
πŸ€” the thing is, i think shri thaneder's all over the place πŸ”„ he's got some legit beefs against pam bondi, but then he starts throwing around impeachment and it feels like a publicity stunt πŸ’β€β™‚οΈ his record on impeaching trump folks hasn't been super successful either πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

anyway, here's a flowchart of what i'd imagine thaneder's thought process looking like:
```
+--+
| |
| |
v v
+-----------+ +-----------+
| Criticize | | Vote |
| Pam Bondi | | Impeach |
| for stuff |-------> | (not) |
| | +-----------+
| | |
| | +-----------------------+ |
| | | Win reelection | |
| | | (maybe?) | |
| | +-----------------------+
```
it's all about the politics πŸ›οΈ and i'm not sure how thaneder's gonna shake things up in this one πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ Another Democrat trying to take on Trump-era officials with impeachment... because that's exactly what the country needs - more partisan bickering πŸ˜’. I mean, Thanedar's got some serious beefs against Pam Bondi, but is this just a desperate attempt to get attention before his own reelection bid? πŸ€” The guy's been to Congress like 3 times already and now he's trying to take on the Attorney General... I'm not sure if he's trying to prove something about himself or if he's just really, really unhappy 😩. Anyway, it'll be interesting to see how this plays out in a Republican-controlled House πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
I'm low-key salty about this whole thing πŸ€”. I mean, Pam Bondi's been around since the Trump era, but this is some next-level stuff. The guy's trying to take down another Trump-era official? It's like he's stuck in a never-ending loop of impeachment attempts πŸ˜’. And yeah, she's got some skeletons in her closet, no doubt about it, but can't we just focus on the 2024 elections already? πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ Thanedar's gonna have to do way better than this to take down Bondi and maybe even make it out of the primary 🀞. It's gonna be an interesting election season, that's for sure... πŸ‘€
 
I'm intrigued by this latest move from Rep. Thanedar πŸ€”. It seems like he's got some serious ammo against AG Bondi πŸ‘€, but at the same time, it's hard not to wonder if he's just trying to stir up controversy for his own reelection campaign πŸ—³οΈ. I mean, the fact that he's filed impeachment articles against someone with a polarizing record before (Trump) and didn't gain much traction suggests that this might be more about Thanedar's own political ambitions than actual concerns about AG Bondi's actions πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ.

And let's not forget, Republicans are already saying they won't allow these articles to come up for a vote in the House... it feels like a losing battle 😬. It'll be interesting to see how this all plays out and what impact Thanedar hopes to make on the issue 🀞
 
I gotta say, I'm kinda torn on this one πŸ€”. On one hand, I get why Congressman Thanedar wants to take action against Pam Bondi - her record does seem pretty shady, especially when it comes to her loyalty to Trump πŸ’Ό. But at the same time, impeachment is a big deal and I'm not sure if it's the right move here πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ.

I mean, Thanedar has had two previous pushes that didn't go anywhere, so you gotta wonder if this one will be any different πŸ•°οΈ. And with Republicans in control of the chamber, it seems like a long shot 🚫. Plus, I'm not sure how effective impeachment is in holding people accountable, especially when they've already served their time πŸ”’.

That being said, if anyone's got a reason to call Bondi out on her actions, it's Thanedar πŸ’ͺ. He's got the guts to take on some of the tough issues and fight for what he believes in 🎯. Just hope that whoever ends up running in the primary can build on his momentum and actually make something happen πŸ’¨
 
I gotta say, I'm so done with these endless attempts at impeachment πŸ™„. I mean, can't they just focus on actually solving problems instead of trying to score political points? Shri Thanedar's got some serious grudges against Pam Bondi, but does that make her a bad AG? Not necessarily πŸ€”. And what's up with the timing? Trying to take her down right before an election? That's just cheap politics, if you ask me πŸ˜’. I get that she made some questionable decisions as AG, but let's not forget that Bondi's also been a thorn in Trump's side - doesn't that count for something? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ Anyway, I'm curious to see how this all plays out, but I'm not holding my breath πŸ‘€.
 
Back
Top