come on, $5 billion is a lot to just start throwing around because trump got his accounts closed by jpmorgan 
. i mean, we all know how bad trump was for the environment with those fossil fuel policies, so it's no surprise that some banks would want to distance themselves from him. and let's not forget, he's trying to make a quick buck off this lawsuit, lol. but seriously, if jpmorgan really thought it was about politics, they should have spoken up instead of just quietly closing the accounts 60 days in advance 
. and can we get some real details on what 'reputational risk' even means? sounds like a fancy way of saying "we don't want to be associated with trump's mess" 
.
. i mean, we all know how bad trump was for the environment with those fossil fuel policies, so it's no surprise that some banks would want to distance themselves from him. and let's not forget, he's trying to make a quick buck off this lawsuit, lol. but seriously, if jpmorgan really thought it was about politics, they should have spoken up instead of just quietly closing the accounts 60 days in advance . and can we get some real details on what 'reputational risk' even means? sounds like a fancy way of saying "we don't want to be associated with trump's mess" .
jpmorgan is literally getting roasted here and they're still denying everything 
meanwhile trump is just trying to get a slap on the wrist from the court like he thinks his "big league" status will protect him 
the fact that they gave him 60 days notice is laughable, what was he even supposed to do in that time? 
And now the whole debate about debanking is back again. I feel like this is gonna get all messy. The government is already having a hard time policing banks, can they really do anything about this? 