I don't know, man...

I'm still trying to figure out what just went down with Greenland and Europe's response to it. On one hand, I get that they needed to take a firm stance against Trump's threats, but on the other hand, is this really gonna lead to more cooperation between Europe and the US? It feels like a bunch of politicking to me...
And what's up with the whole "deterrence theory" thing? Like, we're talking about nuclear deterrence here, right?

That's not something you can just casually deploy without thinking it through. I'm worried that this is gonna be a slippery slope where countries start using this kind of thing to intimidate each other and escalate conflicts.
I mean, I get that Trump was trying to test the waters, but Europe needs to be more careful here. They shouldn't have to resort to economic retaliation just because they wanted to stand up for themselves. Can't we just talk things out like civilized countries?
Anyway, it's all good now, I guess... Trump backed down and everyone's happy again... but let's not forget that this is a whole bunch of hot air and posturing. We need to be more careful with how we approach these kinds of conflicts in the future...
