Casey Means, Trump's Nominee for Surgeon General, Sparks Concern Over Anti-Science Views and Conflicts of Interest
President Donald Trump has nominated Casey Means, a wellness influencer and entrepreneur, to become the next Surgeon General, sparking concerns among medical experts over her lack of experience in traditional medicine and her advocacy for unproven practices.
Means is best known for running a company that sells glucose monitoring systems and promoting a "functional medicine" approach that emphasizes holistic treatments and natural remedies. However, critics argue that this approach is based on pseudoscience and has been discredited by the medical community.
One of Means' biggest concerns is her anti-vaccine sentiments, which have been a major point of contention among public health experts. She has also expressed skepticism about the safety of certain medications, including vaccines and blood thinners.
Dr. Ryan Marino, a board-certified physician and associate professor at Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, has criticized Means' approach to medicine, calling it "quackery" that is "nothing more than self-promotion."
Others have raised concerns over Means' financial relationships with supplement companies and medical device manufacturers, which could create conflicts of interest in her role as Surgeon General. She has also invested in tobacco companies, which has sparked concerns about the potential influence of these interests on public health policy.
Means has promoted the idea that a diet rich in organic produce can help to heal the environment and improve human health, but critics argue that this approach is impractical and may even be detrimental to public health. Genetically modified crops, for example, have been shown to require fewer resources and pesticides than organic alternatives.
The nomination of Casey Means as Surgeon General has sparked a heated debate among medical experts and public health advocates, who are concerned about the potential influence of anti-science views on public health policy. As the next Surgeon General, Means would be responsible for communicating with the public and shaping national conversation on health issues, but critics argue that her approach is based on unproven practices and self-promotion rather than evidence-based medicine.
President Donald Trump has nominated Casey Means, a wellness influencer and entrepreneur, to become the next Surgeon General, sparking concerns among medical experts over her lack of experience in traditional medicine and her advocacy for unproven practices.
Means is best known for running a company that sells glucose monitoring systems and promoting a "functional medicine" approach that emphasizes holistic treatments and natural remedies. However, critics argue that this approach is based on pseudoscience and has been discredited by the medical community.
One of Means' biggest concerns is her anti-vaccine sentiments, which have been a major point of contention among public health experts. She has also expressed skepticism about the safety of certain medications, including vaccines and blood thinners.
Dr. Ryan Marino, a board-certified physician and associate professor at Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, has criticized Means' approach to medicine, calling it "quackery" that is "nothing more than self-promotion."
Others have raised concerns over Means' financial relationships with supplement companies and medical device manufacturers, which could create conflicts of interest in her role as Surgeon General. She has also invested in tobacco companies, which has sparked concerns about the potential influence of these interests on public health policy.
Means has promoted the idea that a diet rich in organic produce can help to heal the environment and improve human health, but critics argue that this approach is impractical and may even be detrimental to public health. Genetically modified crops, for example, have been shown to require fewer resources and pesticides than organic alternatives.
The nomination of Casey Means as Surgeon General has sparked a heated debate among medical experts and public health advocates, who are concerned about the potential influence of anti-science views on public health policy. As the next Surgeon General, Means would be responsible for communicating with the public and shaping national conversation on health issues, but critics argue that her approach is based on unproven practices and self-promotion rather than evidence-based medicine.
! As a former wellness influencer myself (just kidding, I was never that popular 
), I can tell you how frustrating it must be to have your "experts" in the field of medicine being scrutinized like this. Casey Means' lack of experience and her promoting pseudoscientific stuff is super concerning 
. And don't even get me started on her anti-vaccine views... come on, folks! Vaccines are lifesavers 
. I mean, what's next? Is she going to tell us that antibiotics don't work anymore? 
. As Surgeon General, she'd be making decisions that could affect our entire nation's health, but it seems like her interests are way more about self-promotion than public service 
.
), but I think we should at least hold these kinds of nominations to a higher standard. Let's make sure our public health leaders are making decisions based on science, not pseudoscience or personal interests 
. We need someone who's going to prioritize the well-being of the American people over their own bank account 
.
how can someone with no medical experience lead a whole team of docs & scientists ?? 
means seems like shes more interested in making money than helping ppl 
what if she uses her posh to promote toxic products or deny ppl access to meds that actually work 
we need evidence based docs leading the way, not quackery 
, I mean what's next? Letting unproven supplements be marketed as medicine? It's just not right 
casey means' background in functional medicine is super sketchy 
She's got no idea what she's doing and her views on vaccines and medications are straight outta a conspiracy theory book. And don't even get me started on her financial ties to supplement companies and tobacco - it's like she's got a personal vendetta against public health 
.
It's like we're living in some kind of crazy dream world where facts don't matter and science is just a word we use to shut people up 
And have you seen the companies she's invested in? It's like, totally conflicting of interest 
She seems more interested in pushing her own agenda of "functional medicine" and detox diets 
. I'm all for promoting healthy living and wellness, but this is just a recipe for disaster 
. We need someone who actually knows what they're talking about in that role, not some wellness influencer with an agenda 
It's gotta be tough for people to trust her advice on serious health issues like vaccines and medication safety.
. And don't even get me started on her financial ties with supplement companies... that's a huge conflict of interest 
no thanks, I'll stick to the evidence-based medicine, thanks 