The FBI's raid on a journalist's home is not an isolated incident, but rather part of a broader trend of authoritarianism against the press in the US. Over decades, the government has been eroding the First Amendment rights of journalists and their sources through increasingly harsh laws and aggressive enforcement.
The Espionage Act, originally enacted during World War I, was revived in the 1970s to prosecute whistleblowers who revealed government secrets. However, it wasn't until the Obama administration that the law began to be used more aggressively against journalists and their sources. The Department of Justice normalized the use of the Espionage Act as a tool to silence critics and punish leakers.
The consequences of this trend have been severe. Whistleblowers like Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden, and John Kiriakou were charged with crimes for revealing government wrongdoing, while journalists who refused to name their sources were threatened with jail time. The government's pursuit of WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange, including an unprecedented Espionage Act indictment, set a new standard for the prosecution of journalists.
The Trump administration took this trend even further, using the national security state as a weapon against the press. But what makes the FBI's raid on Hannah Natanson particularly disturbing is that it is not a rupture in this trend, but rather an escalation. The use of law enforcement to intimidate and silence journalists has become normalized, with many government officials seemingly emboldened by the power they wield.
The 2023 raid on Natanson's home was part of a broader pattern of newsroom raids, which have become increasingly common under the guise of investigating identity theft laws or computer crimes. These raids are not about finding information; they're about intimidating journalists and incriminating them in the eyes of the public.
As journalist Seth Harp discovered recently, Americans are being primed to accept the administration's claims that reporting government secrets is illegal "leaking" and naming government officials driving big news stories is illegal "doxing." This is a deadly combination, as it sets up journalists for prosecution under laws that were originally designed to target enemy spies, not investigative reporters.
The US supreme court has largely failed to provide meaningful protections against these types of raids. The Privacy Protection Act of 1980, passed in response to a raid on the Stanford Daily, was supposed to put an end to such abuses, but it remains relatively toothless. Its efficacy depends on police, prosecutors, and judges taking it seriously โ which they often don't.
In recent years, there have been numerous examples of newsroom raids gone wrong, from San Francisco to Kansas. The FBI's raid on Natanson's home is just the latest in a long line of brazen attempts to silence journalists under the guise of law enforcement. As journalist Mark Rasch put it, during newsroom raids "the government invariably seizes materials wholly unrelated to whatever they are investigating." This act alone has a chilling effect on freedom of the press.
The normalization of invading newsrooms is now spreading to the highest levels of the federal government. Prosecutors seem to be following their own guidelines, and officials like Pam Bondi appear to be complicit in this erosion of First Amendment rights. The result is a deadly weapon being wielded against the free press โ one that can lead to beatings, jail time, and even rape in prison.
The FBI's raid on Hannah Natanson's home is not an isolated incident; it is part of a broader trend of authoritarianism against the press in the US. As long as we allow this erosion of First Amendment rights to continue, our democracy will remain under threat.
The Espionage Act, originally enacted during World War I, was revived in the 1970s to prosecute whistleblowers who revealed government secrets. However, it wasn't until the Obama administration that the law began to be used more aggressively against journalists and their sources. The Department of Justice normalized the use of the Espionage Act as a tool to silence critics and punish leakers.
The consequences of this trend have been severe. Whistleblowers like Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden, and John Kiriakou were charged with crimes for revealing government wrongdoing, while journalists who refused to name their sources were threatened with jail time. The government's pursuit of WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange, including an unprecedented Espionage Act indictment, set a new standard for the prosecution of journalists.
The Trump administration took this trend even further, using the national security state as a weapon against the press. But what makes the FBI's raid on Hannah Natanson particularly disturbing is that it is not a rupture in this trend, but rather an escalation. The use of law enforcement to intimidate and silence journalists has become normalized, with many government officials seemingly emboldened by the power they wield.
The 2023 raid on Natanson's home was part of a broader pattern of newsroom raids, which have become increasingly common under the guise of investigating identity theft laws or computer crimes. These raids are not about finding information; they're about intimidating journalists and incriminating them in the eyes of the public.
As journalist Seth Harp discovered recently, Americans are being primed to accept the administration's claims that reporting government secrets is illegal "leaking" and naming government officials driving big news stories is illegal "doxing." This is a deadly combination, as it sets up journalists for prosecution under laws that were originally designed to target enemy spies, not investigative reporters.
The US supreme court has largely failed to provide meaningful protections against these types of raids. The Privacy Protection Act of 1980, passed in response to a raid on the Stanford Daily, was supposed to put an end to such abuses, but it remains relatively toothless. Its efficacy depends on police, prosecutors, and judges taking it seriously โ which they often don't.
In recent years, there have been numerous examples of newsroom raids gone wrong, from San Francisco to Kansas. The FBI's raid on Natanson's home is just the latest in a long line of brazen attempts to silence journalists under the guise of law enforcement. As journalist Mark Rasch put it, during newsroom raids "the government invariably seizes materials wholly unrelated to whatever they are investigating." This act alone has a chilling effect on freedom of the press.
The normalization of invading newsrooms is now spreading to the highest levels of the federal government. Prosecutors seem to be following their own guidelines, and officials like Pam Bondi appear to be complicit in this erosion of First Amendment rights. The result is a deadly weapon being wielded against the free press โ one that can lead to beatings, jail time, and even rape in prison.
The FBI's raid on Hannah Natanson's home is not an isolated incident; it is part of a broader trend of authoritarianism against the press in the US. As long as we allow this erosion of First Amendment rights to continue, our democracy will remain under threat.