Federal authorities have long used intimidation and violence to silence protesters, as evidenced by the recent killings of ICU nurse Alex Pretti and immigrant Renee Nicole Good at the hands of ICE agents. However, a pattern of targeting peaceful protesters with charges of domestic terrorism has only intensified in recent years.
Critics argue that this is part of an ongoing strategy to criminalize dissent, with over 100 prosecutions under Section 111 of Title 18 of the US code filed against protesters in the second half of 2025. The use of this law to charge protesters with resisting federal employees, while ignoring the actions of perpetrators, has been widely criticized as a tactic to silence opposition.
Immigrant activists have long faced hostility and intimidation from federal authorities, but recent events suggest that this is becoming a nationwide phenomenon. In one recent incident in Portland, Maine, an ICE officer threatened to label a citizen a "domestic terrorist" if they did not stop recording him on their phone. This type of behavior has become increasingly common, with reports of ICE officers targeting protesters and activists who try to document their actions.
A war on solidarity is unfolding as white supremacy seeks to control white people and maintain the status quo. Historian Nick Estes argues that the killing of white people by federal agents in Minneapolis is a form of retaliation against those who are defending immigrant neighbors and trying to stand up for social justice.
The Insurrection Act, created to prevent protests, has been used throughout US history to silence dissenting voices. Meanwhile, concerns about government overreach and securitization have grown since 9/11 under the banner of anti-terrorism, leading to widespread surveillance of US citizens and increased targeting of marginalized groups.
Many experts argue that the current situation is a result of a long-standing pattern of using intimidation and violence to silence dissenting voices. As historian Gloria J Browne-Marshall notes, this is "part and parcel" of US history. The recent surge in anti-protest laws and charges has only heightened concerns about the erosion of civil liberties and the silencing of marginalized voices.
To resist this trend, many are calling for community-based initiatives, such as mutual aid efforts and social media campaigns, to counter the intimidation tactics used by federal authorities. Others are advocating for the abolition of ICE and an end to securitization policies that allow for widespread surveillance of US citizens.
Ultimately, the goal of these laws and tactics appears to be to silence dissenting voices and maintain the power of those in control. However, as Estes notes, human solidarity is triumphing in the face of this violent moment, with people coming together to resist oppression and demand justice.
Critics argue that this is part of an ongoing strategy to criminalize dissent, with over 100 prosecutions under Section 111 of Title 18 of the US code filed against protesters in the second half of 2025. The use of this law to charge protesters with resisting federal employees, while ignoring the actions of perpetrators, has been widely criticized as a tactic to silence opposition.
Immigrant activists have long faced hostility and intimidation from federal authorities, but recent events suggest that this is becoming a nationwide phenomenon. In one recent incident in Portland, Maine, an ICE officer threatened to label a citizen a "domestic terrorist" if they did not stop recording him on their phone. This type of behavior has become increasingly common, with reports of ICE officers targeting protesters and activists who try to document their actions.
A war on solidarity is unfolding as white supremacy seeks to control white people and maintain the status quo. Historian Nick Estes argues that the killing of white people by federal agents in Minneapolis is a form of retaliation against those who are defending immigrant neighbors and trying to stand up for social justice.
The Insurrection Act, created to prevent protests, has been used throughout US history to silence dissenting voices. Meanwhile, concerns about government overreach and securitization have grown since 9/11 under the banner of anti-terrorism, leading to widespread surveillance of US citizens and increased targeting of marginalized groups.
Many experts argue that the current situation is a result of a long-standing pattern of using intimidation and violence to silence dissenting voices. As historian Gloria J Browne-Marshall notes, this is "part and parcel" of US history. The recent surge in anti-protest laws and charges has only heightened concerns about the erosion of civil liberties and the silencing of marginalized voices.
To resist this trend, many are calling for community-based initiatives, such as mutual aid efforts and social media campaigns, to counter the intimidation tactics used by federal authorities. Others are advocating for the abolition of ICE and an end to securitization policies that allow for widespread surveillance of US citizens.
Ultimately, the goal of these laws and tactics appears to be to silence dissenting voices and maintain the power of those in control. However, as Estes notes, human solidarity is triumphing in the face of this violent moment, with people coming together to resist oppression and demand justice.