Major social media companies face scrutiny in court over their alleged role in addicting children to their platforms. The Los Angeles County Superior Court trial is one of several landmark cases this year that seek to hold these corporations responsible for the harms caused by their products.
The lawsuit, filed by a 20-year-old woman identified as "KGM," claims that Meta and Google's YouTube deliberately designed features that maximize youth engagement to boost advertising revenue. The case is seen as a test case for other lawsuits against social media companies.
According to Mark Lanier, the plaintiffs' lawyer, internal documents show that Meta knew children who experienced adverse events, such as trauma and stress, were particularly vulnerable to addiction. He also presented findings from a study called "Project Myst," which surveyed 1,000 teens and their parents about their social media use.
The lawsuit claims that Meta and YouTube have engineered addiction in children's brains by exploiting psychological vulnerabilities and manipulating their algorithms to keep them engaged for longer periods. Lanier drew comparisons between the social media companies and tobacco firms, citing internal communication between Meta employees who were concerned about the company's lack of proactive action about the potential harm its platforms can cause.
KGM claims that her use of social media from an early age addicted her to the technology and exacerbated depression and suicidal thoughts. The lawsuit seeks damages for the plaintiff and potentially sets a precedent for other lawsuits against social media companies.
The outcome of this trial could have significant implications for the way these corporations handle children using their platforms, with potential consequences for their businesses and profits.
The lawsuit, filed by a 20-year-old woman identified as "KGM," claims that Meta and Google's YouTube deliberately designed features that maximize youth engagement to boost advertising revenue. The case is seen as a test case for other lawsuits against social media companies.
According to Mark Lanier, the plaintiffs' lawyer, internal documents show that Meta knew children who experienced adverse events, such as trauma and stress, were particularly vulnerable to addiction. He also presented findings from a study called "Project Myst," which surveyed 1,000 teens and their parents about their social media use.
The lawsuit claims that Meta and YouTube have engineered addiction in children's brains by exploiting psychological vulnerabilities and manipulating their algorithms to keep them engaged for longer periods. Lanier drew comparisons between the social media companies and tobacco firms, citing internal communication between Meta employees who were concerned about the company's lack of proactive action about the potential harm its platforms can cause.
KGM claims that her use of social media from an early age addicted her to the technology and exacerbated depression and suicidal thoughts. The lawsuit seeks damages for the plaintiff and potentially sets a precedent for other lawsuits against social media companies.
The outcome of this trial could have significant implications for the way these corporations handle children using their platforms, with potential consequences for their businesses and profits.