School board for Broadview, Maywood, Melrose Park rejects investigation into kickback allegations

School Board Vote Sparks Concerns Over Allegations of Kickbacks and Bid Rigging in Chicago Suburbs

A contentious vote by the Maywood-Melrose Park-Broadview School District 89 board of education has raised eyebrows over allegations of kickbacks and bid rigging. The board rejected a proposal to launch an investigation into accusations that a school board member, Sandra Ciancio, solicited cash goodies from a concrete contractor in exchange for taxpayer-funded work.

The allegations surfaced during an October meeting when contractor Michael D'Addosio accused Ciancio of pressuring him for kickbacks in exchange for insider bid information. D'Addosio claimed that he had been blackballed from local government work as a result of speaking out against the alleged scheme.

Despite earlier claims by some board members that an investigation would be launched, the board voted down the proposal 3-2 without explanation. The decision has left many concerned about the lack of transparency and accountability within the district.

Laighton H. Scott III, one of the two board members who initially supported the investigation, expressed his frustration with the vote. He stated that he was troubled by the board's decision to reject the inquiry, citing concerns over potential liability and public confidence in the district.

The allegations against Ciancio have sparked further controversy due to her close ties with Melrose Park Mayor Ron Serpico. Records show that she has contributed campaign money to his campaigns and has also donated to the campaign fund of Cook County Judge ShawnTe Raines-Welch, wife of former Illinois House Speaker Michael J. Madigan.

The school district's law firm is shared with Serpico's municipal government, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest. The district serves over 4,000 students in kindergarten through 8th grade and has struggled with academic scores.

As the investigation into Ciancio's allegations continues, it remains to be seen how the school board will address the issue and ensure transparency and accountability within the district.
 
๐Ÿค” This is some wild stuff going on in the Chicago suburbs. I mean, who does that? Sandra Ciancio allegedly trying to get kickbacks from a contractor for some shady deal? And now the whole thing is being swept under the rug because of some vague concerns about liability and public confidence ๐Ÿ™„. The more I think about it, the angrier I get. What's going on with these officials and their buddies in city hall? It's like they're more interested in lining their own pockets than doing what's best for the kids and taxpayers ๐Ÿ’ธ. And now, there's this whole mess with the mayor and his wife being tied to the school district... it's just a web of corruption that needs to be untangled ๐Ÿ•ธ๏ธ. The only good thing is that someone's pushing back, even if it's just Laighton H. Scott III, who seems like a straight shooter ๐Ÿ’ช.
 
can u imagine having that much power & influence but still being so corrupt ๐Ÿคฏ schools r supposed 2 b about the kids not politics ๐Ÿ’ธ gotta keep an eye on this one ๐Ÿ‘€
 
OMG, THIS IS SO WEIRD!!! ๐Ÿคฏ i cant even believe the school board voted down an investigation into sandra ciancio's alleged kickbacks & bid rigging!!! ๐Ÿค‘ it looks like there are some pretty serious conflicts of interest going on here... LIKE, how can we trust that she's not just doing what's best for her own pocketbook instead of the kids? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ also, isn't it suspicious that the law firm they use is shared with serpico's municipal government?! ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ‘€ it's like they're trying to cover something up!!! ๐Ÿ˜ณ
 
Omg what a surprise... another scandal brewing in Chicago Suburbs ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™€๏ธ like they don't have enough on their plates already. I mean who wouldn't want a little "insider info" to make things easier, right? ๐Ÿ˜’ It's not like the taxpayers are paying them to keep everything under wraps or anything... and now we've got a board member accusing someone of bribery because that never happens before ๐Ÿ™„. And poor Laighton H. Scott III, stuck in the middle with no explanation... thanks for explaining nothing, Board Members ๐Ÿ˜’. Can't wait to see how this all plays out...
 
๐Ÿค” I'm really concerned about what's going on in this school district. It sounds like there's a lot of cronyism going on with some board members having ties to local politicians and their families being involved in contracting work. ๐Ÿค‘ How can we trust that taxpayer money is being used for the right reasons? It's not just about kickbacks, but also about potential conflicts of interest that could impact decision-making. We need transparency and accountability now more than ever! ๐Ÿ’ฏ
 
I'm getting a major red flag here ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ’ธ. If what Michael D'Addosio is saying about Sandra Ciancio is true, it's huge. I mean, we're talking about allegations of kickbacks and bid rigging in a school district where millions of dollars are being spent on taxpayer-funded projects. That's not just shady, that's corrupt ๐Ÿค‘.

And let's not forget about the ties to Ron Serpico's campaign fund and the shared law firm with his municipal government... it's starting to look like a big ol' web of cronyism ๐Ÿค. I'm worried about the integrity of the school district and the fact that some board members are just letting it slide ๐Ÿ‘Ž.

We need more transparency and accountability, not less ๐Ÿ˜’. If an investigation is going to happen, let's see it through to the end. We deserve better than this kind of backroom deal-making ๐Ÿค.
 
This is getting so crazy ๐Ÿคฏ. It seems like there are some seriously shady dealings going on in this school district. Sandra Ciancio thought she was above the law by trying to sweeten up her deal with that contractor, but now it's backfiring big time. I mean, who tries to get kickbacks from a contractor? It's just basic corruption 101 ๐Ÿ™„.

And then you've got these connections to local politics and judges... it's like a web of influence and cronyism ๐Ÿค. If there's even a hint of truth to Ciancio's alleged scheme, the school district needs to be all over it ASAP ๐Ÿ’ช. Transparency and accountability are key in a place where students' futures are being made or broken.

The fact that the board voted down the investigation without explanation is just red flag after red flag ๐Ÿšจ. It's like they're trying to sweep this under the rug or something. I hope someone takes a closer look at these allegations and gets to the bottom of it ๐Ÿ‘€.
 
๐Ÿค” what's up with the lack of transparency on this board?! they're supposed to be lookin out for the kids but instead they're all about keepin it quiet & coverin each other's backs. Sandra Ciancio thinks she can just waltz in, take some cash from a contractor, and then expect everyone else to just chill? ๐Ÿค‘ that's not how governance works, fam! Laighton H. Scott III is right on point when he says they're worried about liability but I think the real liability is their own lack of integrity. And what's up with these connections between Ciancio & the mayor & the judge?! it's like a whole web of corruption ๐Ÿ•ธ๏ธ. The district needs some serious cleaning out, imo.
 
Ugh, can you believe what's going on in this Chicago suburb? ๐Ÿคฏ I mean, a school board member allegedly taking kickbacks from a contractor just because of who they know? That's like something out of a bad sitcom, but it's real life, sadly ๐Ÿ˜”. And the worst part is that the board voted down an investigation into these allegations without even explaining themselves. Like, what's going on here? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ Don't get me wrong, I'm all for transparency and accountability in our institutions, but this just reeks of cronyism and corruption ๐Ÿ’ธ.

And let's not forget about the conflict of interest with the mayor's office and the school district's law firm sharing the same space. It's like they're trying to make it look like everything is above board when really it's all about who's got their back ๐Ÿค. I just hope the investigation into Sandra Ciancio's allegations gets somewhere and that some accountability is finally brought to this mess ๐Ÿ™.
 
๐Ÿค” This whole thing just smells like corruption ๐Ÿšฝ. I mean, come on, a school board member accused of taking kickbacks from a contractor? That's just basic ethics 101. And what really gets my goat is that they voted down the investigation without explanation ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ. It's like they're trying to sweep this under the rug.

And don't even get me started on Ciancio's connections to the mayor and other high-ranking officials ๐Ÿค. It's a total conflict of interest, and it raises so many red flags. The fact that their law firm is shared with Serpico's municipal government? Yeah, that's just too much to ignore.

I'm worried about the students in this district who deserve better than corrupt officials ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. They need transparency and accountability now more than ever. I hope they actually investigate Ciancio and get to the bottom of this thing.
 
๐Ÿค” I'm really worried about this whole thing, especially since our school board is supposed to be all about transparency and public trust ๐Ÿ“š๐Ÿ’ก. I mean, think about it - if a member of the school board is allegedly taking bribes from a contractor, that's not just a problem for the district, but also for our own students who deserve better than corrupt adults in charge ๐Ÿ‘ง๐Ÿผ๐Ÿค. The fact that they voted down the proposal without explanation is super concerning ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ’”. As a student, I want to feel like my school board is looking out for me and making sure that we're getting the best education possible, not just lining their own pockets ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ“Š. This whole situation needs to be looked into ASAP ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ.
 
Back
Top