Rapper Rod Wave is facing a lawsuit from a Florida-based photographer, Allan Salas, alleging that he stole the image featured on the cover of his 2024 album "Last Lap".
According to the complaint filed last week, Salas snapped the photo at a concert in August 2024 and claims he was never paid for its use – even after Rod Wave's representatives were explicitly warned that the photographer owned it.
The lawsuit states that despite being given permission to take photos at the event, Salas retained ownership of the image. However, when his work was included on the album cover, merchandise like t-shirts, and promoted through an arena tour, without receiving any compensation or credit, he feels utterly disregarded.
Rod Wave's team allegedly knew about the photo's origin but failed to attempt to contact Salas or obtain permission, let alone a license. This is not the first time the rapper has been involved in a copyright infringement dispute. In another case, Cam’ron was sued over using a 2003 image of himself without permission.
The law is clear: simply being featured in a photo does not grant you ownership. Copyrights are owned by the photographer, and using them without consent is considered infringement.
According to the complaint filed last week, Salas snapped the photo at a concert in August 2024 and claims he was never paid for its use – even after Rod Wave's representatives were explicitly warned that the photographer owned it.
The lawsuit states that despite being given permission to take photos at the event, Salas retained ownership of the image. However, when his work was included on the album cover, merchandise like t-shirts, and promoted through an arena tour, without receiving any compensation or credit, he feels utterly disregarded.
Rod Wave's team allegedly knew about the photo's origin but failed to attempt to contact Salas or obtain permission, let alone a license. This is not the first time the rapper has been involved in a copyright infringement dispute. In another case, Cam’ron was sued over using a 2003 image of himself without permission.
The law is clear: simply being featured in a photo does not grant you ownership. Copyrights are owned by the photographer, and using them without consent is considered infringement.