Germany Weighs Repatriating Billions Worth of Gold from US Vaults Amid Shift in Relations and Trump Uncertainty
Berlin is facing growing pressure to bring home its vast gold reserves, currently valued at €164 billion ($122 billion) and stored in New York vaults. German economists have called for the gold to be repatriated due to concerns over the unpredictable nature of Donald Trump's administration, citing geopolitical tensions and potential for US attempts to seize European assets.
The Bundesbank, Germany's central bank, currently holds 1,236 tonnes of gold worth €122 billion in New York, alongside approximately half of its total reserves stored in Frankfurt. However, with rising concerns over strategic independence from the US, economists argue that bringing home the gold would strengthen Germany's position and safeguard against potential asset seizures.
Former Bundesbank chief economist Emanuel Mönch states that it is "too risky" to store such significant assets in US vaults under Trump's leadership. He also suggests that repatriating the gold could be a strategic move for greater European independence, echoing sentiments from other economists such as Michael Jäger, head of the European Taxpayers Association.
While some prominent economists like Clemens Fuest have warned against a potential move, citing concerns over unintended consequences, others are urging Berlin to reconsider its current storage arrangements. This shift in opinion reflects growing unease among German politicians about US reliability and Trump's rhetoric on Europe.
Critics argue that the US is "no longer a reliable partner" under Trump, with some experts questioning Germany's long-term strategy of keeping gold reserves in US vaults. As tensions rise between European partners and Washington, Berlin is weighing its options amid rising fears about asset security.
With nearly €450 billion worth of gold in total storage, repatriation could be a significant move for Germany, but it remains unclear whether the government will act on these concerns or maintain its current storage arrangements. The decision highlights the growing importance of strategic partnerships and asset management during times of international uncertainty.
Berlin is facing growing pressure to bring home its vast gold reserves, currently valued at €164 billion ($122 billion) and stored in New York vaults. German economists have called for the gold to be repatriated due to concerns over the unpredictable nature of Donald Trump's administration, citing geopolitical tensions and potential for US attempts to seize European assets.
The Bundesbank, Germany's central bank, currently holds 1,236 tonnes of gold worth €122 billion in New York, alongside approximately half of its total reserves stored in Frankfurt. However, with rising concerns over strategic independence from the US, economists argue that bringing home the gold would strengthen Germany's position and safeguard against potential asset seizures.
Former Bundesbank chief economist Emanuel Mönch states that it is "too risky" to store such significant assets in US vaults under Trump's leadership. He also suggests that repatriating the gold could be a strategic move for greater European independence, echoing sentiments from other economists such as Michael Jäger, head of the European Taxpayers Association.
While some prominent economists like Clemens Fuest have warned against a potential move, citing concerns over unintended consequences, others are urging Berlin to reconsider its current storage arrangements. This shift in opinion reflects growing unease among German politicians about US reliability and Trump's rhetoric on Europe.
Critics argue that the US is "no longer a reliable partner" under Trump, with some experts questioning Germany's long-term strategy of keeping gold reserves in US vaults. As tensions rise between European partners and Washington, Berlin is weighing its options amid rising fears about asset security.
With nearly €450 billion worth of gold in total storage, repatriation could be a significant move for Germany, but it remains unclear whether the government will act on these concerns or maintain its current storage arrangements. The decision highlights the growing importance of strategic partnerships and asset management during times of international uncertainty.