I gotta say, reworking Rachel Reeves' net zero strategy to give the north a bigger boost makes total sense 
. I mean, clean energy is already a big deal up there and it's crazy that Labour leaders are worried about dismantling "net stupid zero" policies - what's wrong with investing in jobs that create value? 
We can't just ignore the fact that areas like Sunderland are still struggling to recover from heavy industry decline... it's time for some serious investment 
. And let's be real, if we don't get this right, we'll end up widening existing disparities and leaving communities behind 
. I'm all for a good old-fashioned Northern Powerhouse Rail, but clean energy in the north is where it's at 
. I mean, clean energy is already a big deal up there and it's crazy that Labour leaders are worried about dismantling "net stupid zero" policies - what's wrong with investing in jobs that create value? We can't just ignore the fact that areas like Sunderland are still struggling to recover from heavy industry decline... it's time for some serious investment . And let's be real, if we don't get this right, we'll end up widening existing disparities and leaving communities behind . I'm all for a good old-fashioned Northern Powerhouse Rail, but clean energy in the north is where it's at 
it's gonna hurt the north of england big time, they need that clean energy cash to rebuild their cities and bring back jobs, Sunderland is strugglin like Sunderland city council leader Michael Mordey said. Labour leaders are right on this one, we can't afford to have a Trump-like climate change denial agenda in our country 
we gotta prioritize the north and make sure they get that funding ASAP 