Pregnant woman's plea for dog-sitting during childbirth sparks outrage on Reddit.
A 34-year-old expectant mother, JHsquared, took to the online forum Reddit with a candid request: she wanted her 72-year-old mother-in-law (MIL) to care for their two dogs during her labor and delivery. However, when she mentioned that her MIL wouldn't be entrusted with her own children, the response was swift and harsh.
More than 500 Redditors criticized JHsquared's decision, with some suggesting it was unacceptable not to trust her mother-in-law with her kids. One user even quipped, "I can't really think of a way a grandmother wouldn't be offended by being told, 'I trust you to watch my dogs, but not your grandbabies'."
JHsquared had actually never discussed childcare plans with her MIL before; it was simply assumed that she would take care of the children. The mother clarified that caring for their dogs is something her MIL has done in the past without issue, but this time, the request came from a place of necessity – minimizing chaos during a stressful event.
Despite her efforts to frame the decision as a way to keep peace both at home and with her family, JHsquared's plan was met with criticism. Some users suggested that she ask friends or hire a pet sitter for the dogs instead, implying that caring for pets is an easier task than babysitting. It remains to be seen whether JHsquared's decision achieves its intended goal or causes more tension.
The incident highlights the complexities of in-law relationships and how unexpected shifts can lead to hurt feelings. As Ted Lowe, a professor quoted in the article, explained, "Families work like this; each person has their place, their rhythm. Add someone new...and things shift out of balance until the person finds their place."
A 34-year-old expectant mother, JHsquared, took to the online forum Reddit with a candid request: she wanted her 72-year-old mother-in-law (MIL) to care for their two dogs during her labor and delivery. However, when she mentioned that her MIL wouldn't be entrusted with her own children, the response was swift and harsh.
More than 500 Redditors criticized JHsquared's decision, with some suggesting it was unacceptable not to trust her mother-in-law with her kids. One user even quipped, "I can't really think of a way a grandmother wouldn't be offended by being told, 'I trust you to watch my dogs, but not your grandbabies'."
JHsquared had actually never discussed childcare plans with her MIL before; it was simply assumed that she would take care of the children. The mother clarified that caring for their dogs is something her MIL has done in the past without issue, but this time, the request came from a place of necessity – minimizing chaos during a stressful event.
Despite her efforts to frame the decision as a way to keep peace both at home and with her family, JHsquared's plan was met with criticism. Some users suggested that she ask friends or hire a pet sitter for the dogs instead, implying that caring for pets is an easier task than babysitting. It remains to be seen whether JHsquared's decision achieves its intended goal or causes more tension.
The incident highlights the complexities of in-law relationships and how unexpected shifts can lead to hurt feelings. As Ted Lowe, a professor quoted in the article, explained, "Families work like this; each person has their place, their rhythm. Add someone new...and things shift out of balance until the person finds their place."