Police are under increasing pressure to release the ethnicity of suspects in serious incidents, amid concerns that doing so will fuel far-right speculation on social media.
In a bid to combat misinformation after last summer's murder of three schoolgirls in Southport, new guidance was introduced to ensure police processes are "fit for purpose" in an age of rapid information spread. However, critics argue that this move may have an unintended consequence: amplifying racial background and fuelling conspiracy theories when information is not released.
A former senior officer at the Metropolitan Police warned that police are being forced to disclose ethnicity on every occasion, putting them "damned if they do and damned if they don't". They fear that this will create pressure to release details on a regular basis, as far-right groups intensify their online activity after major incidents.
The case of two men arrested in Cambridgeshire following multiple stabbings on a train is a stark example. Despite the 35-year-old suspect being released with no further action and not involved in the attack, police initially disclosed his ethnicity to counter speculation from right-wing groups.
Campaigners have expressed concerns that this move will encourage focus on racial background and lead to further conspiracy theories. They argue that information should only be released if it is factually accurate and serves a legitimate purpose, rather than being used as a tool by far-right groups to push their own agendas.
Conservative MP Ben Obese-Jecty has spoken out against the move, saying that releasing ethnicity details is "sad" but necessary. However, he acknowledged that this was a price police must pay in response to online speculation and pressure from right-wing groups.
The controversy highlights the challenges faced by police forces in balancing transparency with safety concerns and avoiding the amplification of misinformation on social media.
In a bid to combat misinformation after last summer's murder of three schoolgirls in Southport, new guidance was introduced to ensure police processes are "fit for purpose" in an age of rapid information spread. However, critics argue that this move may have an unintended consequence: amplifying racial background and fuelling conspiracy theories when information is not released.
A former senior officer at the Metropolitan Police warned that police are being forced to disclose ethnicity on every occasion, putting them "damned if they do and damned if they don't". They fear that this will create pressure to release details on a regular basis, as far-right groups intensify their online activity after major incidents.
The case of two men arrested in Cambridgeshire following multiple stabbings on a train is a stark example. Despite the 35-year-old suspect being released with no further action and not involved in the attack, police initially disclosed his ethnicity to counter speculation from right-wing groups.
Campaigners have expressed concerns that this move will encourage focus on racial background and lead to further conspiracy theories. They argue that information should only be released if it is factually accurate and serves a legitimate purpose, rather than being used as a tool by far-right groups to push their own agendas.
Conservative MP Ben Obese-Jecty has spoken out against the move, saying that releasing ethnicity details is "sad" but necessary. However, he acknowledged that this was a price police must pay in response to online speculation and pressure from right-wing groups.
The controversy highlights the challenges faced by police forces in balancing transparency with safety concerns and avoiding the amplification of misinformation on social media.