President Trump recently stated that he "feel I won Minnesota" three times, despite losing the state in 2016 and again in 2020. Two weeks later, Attorney General Pam Bondi made a demand for sensitive voting information from Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, likening it to collecting protection money. This move has been widely criticized as an attempt by the Trump administration to intimidate voters.
In January 24, another federal immigration officer killing in Minneapolis took place, and two days later, Bondi appeared on Fox News making her demands known. The timing of these events raises questions about the motivation behind the administration's actions. It appears that the Trump administration is using death and fear as bargaining chips to get what it wants.
U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez has expressed concerns about the quid pro quo at play, asking if the executive branch is trying to achieve a goal through force that cannot be achieved through the courts. The answer, in this case, appears to be yes, with Bondi's demand for voting information having nothing to do with immigration enforcement.
The Trump administration's scrutiny of voter rolls has been manufactured as part of an effort to justify cracking down on elections. However, there is no evidence linking welfare fraud to voter fraud. The Somali daycare scandal was blown up into a grand conspiracy to steal elections, despite the lack of evidence supporting this claim.
In her letter to Walz, Bondi asked for confirmation that Minnesota's registration system complies with the Civil Rights Act of 1960. However, this request appears to be a thinly veiled attempt to intimidate voters and gain access to sensitive information. The Trump administration has been suing roughly two dozen states, including all states it lost in 2020, demanding unredacted voter registration files.
Minnesota's Secretary of State Steve Simon declined to provide the data, citing concerns about violating state and federal privacy laws. Walz responded by saying that he would rather focus on real issues, such as investigating Epstein files.
The Trump administration is testing the boundaries of what it can get away with ahead of the November midterms. The voter roll demands and mass deportations are part of a larger puzzle that includes attacks on birthright citizenship, purges of federal employees, revenge prosecutions, and efforts to control the media. It's all part of the same project: MAGA.
The administration's actions have been widely condemned as an attempt to intimidate voters and undermine democracy. The use of sensitive voting information to build a massive national voter database controlled by the executive branch is chilling and would likely drive down voter participation in immigrant communities.
In January 24, another federal immigration officer killing in Minneapolis took place, and two days later, Bondi appeared on Fox News making her demands known. The timing of these events raises questions about the motivation behind the administration's actions. It appears that the Trump administration is using death and fear as bargaining chips to get what it wants.
U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez has expressed concerns about the quid pro quo at play, asking if the executive branch is trying to achieve a goal through force that cannot be achieved through the courts. The answer, in this case, appears to be yes, with Bondi's demand for voting information having nothing to do with immigration enforcement.
The Trump administration's scrutiny of voter rolls has been manufactured as part of an effort to justify cracking down on elections. However, there is no evidence linking welfare fraud to voter fraud. The Somali daycare scandal was blown up into a grand conspiracy to steal elections, despite the lack of evidence supporting this claim.
In her letter to Walz, Bondi asked for confirmation that Minnesota's registration system complies with the Civil Rights Act of 1960. However, this request appears to be a thinly veiled attempt to intimidate voters and gain access to sensitive information. The Trump administration has been suing roughly two dozen states, including all states it lost in 2020, demanding unredacted voter registration files.
Minnesota's Secretary of State Steve Simon declined to provide the data, citing concerns about violating state and federal privacy laws. Walz responded by saying that he would rather focus on real issues, such as investigating Epstein files.
The Trump administration is testing the boundaries of what it can get away with ahead of the November midterms. The voter roll demands and mass deportations are part of a larger puzzle that includes attacks on birthright citizenship, purges of federal employees, revenge prosecutions, and efforts to control the media. It's all part of the same project: MAGA.
The administration's actions have been widely condemned as an attempt to intimidate voters and undermine democracy. The use of sensitive voting information to build a massive national voter database controlled by the executive branch is chilling and would likely drive down voter participation in immigrant communities.