Ocean City Planning Board rejects measure to clear way for Wonderland Pier hotel project

Ocean City's planning board has dealt another blow to luxury hotel plans for a shuttered amusement park property, rejecting a measure that would have allowed the project to move forward. The site of former Gillian's Wonderland Pier was deemed not suitable for rehabilitation due to concerns raised by residents and business owners.

Icona Resorts' CEO Eustace Mita had been lobbying for zoning relief at the site since 2021, when he purchased the debt-burdened property. He had requested the site be designated as an area in need of rehabilitation, a distinction that applies to sites that are significantly deteriorated or underutilized.

However, the planning board voted 4-4 against Mita's request, resulting in a rejection. This decision will now go to Ocean City Council, which has been divided on how to redevelop the property.

Despite a narrow approval of his initial request by city council last December, Vice President Pete Madden said that the planning board's recommendation is non-binding and may not be followed. "We went to the planning board like we would call an attorney for advice," he explained. "That doesn't mean we have to follow it."

Madden fears that the planning board's vote will delay a decision about the future of the property, with city council meeting again on January 22 to address the issue. If the site is not designated as a rehabilitation zone, it will be reviewed separately in a broader evaluation of zoning along the entire boardwalk.

Icona Resorts had received bids for the property from Virginia-based developer Ryan Homes and the family of Philip and George Norcross, but Mita has said he will sell the property if the hotel project isn't approved. The company's future plans remain uncertain.

While some argue that a designation as an area in need of rehabilitation would have allowed for more flexible redevelopment, others welcome the planning board's decision, saying it prevents over-development and protects the site's original character.
 
omg u guys i cant even believe this is happening 🀯 Icona Resorts has been pushing so hard for a luxury hotel at Gillian's Wonderland Pier but now its all falling apart πŸ’” The planning board rejected their request to designate it as an area in need of rehabilitation which means the city council will have to decide on the future of the property again πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ I think its kinda sad that Icona Resorts is getting close to losing out on this huge deal tho πŸ˜” Ryan Homes and the Norcross family were bidding on it too so now theres all sorts of uncertainty surrounding it πŸ€‘
 
omg u gotta feel 4 the residents & business owners on Ocean City, they've been fighting 4 what feels like forever! πŸ™Œ the fact that Icona Resorts had 2 try 2 get away w/ rehab zoning is just crazy... I mean, who wouldn't wanna turn a creepy old pier into a luxury hotel? πŸ˜‚ but it's all good, bc in the end, it seems like they realized the site just isn't suitable. πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ and honestly, I think that's a pretty smart decision considering how much opposition they faced. let's hope city council can make a decision soon tho... we need to know what's goin 2 happen 2 this iconic spot! πŸ’₯
 
omg what a bummer for Icona Resorts πŸ€• this is like, such a big deal for their luxury hotel plans πŸ¨πŸ’Ό Mita had been pushing hard since 2021 and now it seems like he'll have to regroup πŸ’” the thing about being in an area of need of rehab zone is kinda cool tho πŸ€“ it would've meant more flexibility but some ppl think it was a bad idea πŸ‘Ž
 
The situation with Ocean City's amusement park property is getting pretty complicated 🀯... I think what's concerning me right now is that Icona Resorts' CEO Eustace Mita has been pushing for a zoning relief since 2021, but it looks like the planning board isn't having it. 🚫 It's not just about whether the site should be designated as an area in need of rehabilitation, but what kind of redevelopment plans are on the table if it doesn't happen.

I'm not sure who to take with this one... on one hand, you've got people saying that a designation would have allowed for more flexibility and potentially led to better outcomes. On the other hand, some folks believe it would just lead to over-development and loss of character πŸ€”. The city council's divided views are making me think that we're not gonna see any concrete decisions anytime soon...
 
πŸ€” I'm kinda surprised by this decision. Like, I get that residents and business owners had concerns about the luxury hotel plan, but didn't they think it would be better than what we've got now? It's been closed for years, so I don't see how it's really underutilized πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. And what's with all these different opinions on whether this makes the site unsuitable for rehab? Can't we just try and find a solution that works for everyone? 🀝
 
I'm kinda surprised by this turn of events 😊. I mean, I get why Icona Resorts wanted to push through with their plans, but I think the planning board made a solid call here. The site has been abandoned for a while, it's not like it was still bustling with activity back when Gillian's Wonderland Pier was operating.

Designating the site as an area in need of rehabilitation would've given Icona Resorts more wiggle room to redevelop it without sacrificing its historic charm 🏠. But now that it's been rejected, I think it's better for the community that they're taking a step back and evaluating it with all the other zoning changes along the boardwalk.

It's also interesting to see how divided the city council is on this issue πŸ€”. Some people are worried about over-development, while others want to preserve the site's original character. I think we'll just have to wait and see what happens next... maybe Icona Resorts will find another way to make it work 🀞
 
I'm just gonna say this, Ocean City is really having some major issues with their amusement park place 🀣. I mean, who wouldn't want a luxury hotel at an old pier? It sounds like a dream come true for Mita and his Icona Resorts... but not so much for the people living there πŸ˜…. Apparently they were worried about over-development and ruining the site's original character πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. But on the bright side, who needs a hotel when you've got beachy vibes and boardwalk fun? I guess it's all just part of the never-ending struggle to balance progress with preservation... meanwhile, I'll be over here eating funnel cakes and worrying about my fantasy football draft πŸˆπŸ˜‚
 
I'm not buying this "area in need of rehabilitation" thing. Sounds like just another excuse to kick Icona Resorts out. I mean, if they wanted to develop that place into a hotel, why didn't they do it already? πŸ€‘

And what's with the constant back-and-forth between planning board and Ocean City Council? Can't they make up their minds for once? It's just delaying the inevitable – this place is gonna sit empty for years.

I'm not sure who's more worried about over-development, the planners or the residents. If it's really that big of a deal, why can't they find some compromise? πŸ€”
 
Ugh man, I was really hoping to see those luxury hotels pop up on the pier, now this is a major bummer πŸ˜”. Like, come on people, just give Icona Resorts a break already? They've been trying for years and it's frustrating that the planning board is being so slow. I get where the residents and business owners are coming from, but can't we find some middle ground? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ It's not like they're asking to build some monstrosity on the pier, just a fancy hotel that'll bring in some new revenue for the city. Let's see if the Ocean City Council can figure it out before it's too late... fingers crossed! πŸ’«
 
Back
Top