US lawmakers are accusing Meta, the owner of Facebook and Instagram, of profiting from ads promoting immigration enforcement that some say has ties to neo-Nazi ideology.
The ads in question featured an ICE recruitment campaign that used imagery and music popular in neo-Nazi online spaces. The campaign included a song called "We'll Have Our Home Again" by Pine Tree Riots, which contains lyrics about reclaiming one's homeland by "blood or sweat."
Members of Congress have written to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg urging the company to stop running these ads on its platforms. They claim that the ads' imagery and music were intended to appeal to white nationalists and neo-Nazis, and they want Meta to disclose more information about the scope and duration of its advertising agreement with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
The lawmakers also question whether Meta's new hate-speech policies allow for the running of such ads. They point out that the company removes content historically linked to intimidation or offline violence, but not necessarily all content tied to extremist ideologies.
Meta has not responded to a request for comment on this matter. The Department of Homeland Security defended its recruitment messaging in a statement, arguing that criticism of the campaign amounts to an attack on patriotic expression.
The controversy surrounding these ads is part of a larger debate about how social media companies like Meta balance free speech with concerns about hate speech and extremism.
The ads in question featured an ICE recruitment campaign that used imagery and music popular in neo-Nazi online spaces. The campaign included a song called "We'll Have Our Home Again" by Pine Tree Riots, which contains lyrics about reclaiming one's homeland by "blood or sweat."
Members of Congress have written to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg urging the company to stop running these ads on its platforms. They claim that the ads' imagery and music were intended to appeal to white nationalists and neo-Nazis, and they want Meta to disclose more information about the scope and duration of its advertising agreement with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
The lawmakers also question whether Meta's new hate-speech policies allow for the running of such ads. They point out that the company removes content historically linked to intimidation or offline violence, but not necessarily all content tied to extremist ideologies.
Meta has not responded to a request for comment on this matter. The Department of Homeland Security defended its recruitment messaging in a statement, arguing that criticism of the campaign amounts to an attack on patriotic expression.
The controversy surrounding these ads is part of a larger debate about how social media companies like Meta balance free speech with concerns about hate speech and extremism.