The Republican Party's Shift on Climate Change: A Case of Missed Opportunity?
In 1988, the US was hit by a devastating drought, with crops withering in fields nationwide and dust storms sweeping across the midwest and northern Great Plains. The disaster resulted in an estimated $60 billion in damage, and unrelentingly hot temperatures killed between 5,000 and 10,000 people. Amidst this chaos, then-Ronald Reagan's vice-president George HW Bush met with farmers in Michigan, promising to be the environmental president if elected.
Bush acknowledged the reality of climate change, attributing it to the burning of fossil fuels, which released excess carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. However, he also emphasized that there were those who thought they could do nothing about it, and instead chose to "forget about the White House Effect" - sound environmental policy for leading consumer of fossil fuels.
This clip appears early in The White House Effect, a new documentary examining how Republicans changed course on climate change. The 96-minute film is now available on Netflix, exploring the evolution of the climate crisis from non-partisan reality to divisive political issue.
The documentary takes its name from Bush's unfulfilled promise of environmental action during his presidency. It examines the forces that eroded such purpose, including corporations that downplayed scientific evidence and White House chief of staff John Sununu's power games.
Through meticulously edited archival footage, the film illustrates the politicization of climate change. The filmmakers sorted through 14,000 clips from over 100 sources, including VHS tapes stored in a former Exxon Mobil publicist's garage.
The film highlights Bush's equivocation on climate change by 1990, when he spoke at a White House conference, stating that scientists had "two diametrically opposed points of view" on the issue. This marked a turning point for the US, hamstrung by political division.
Today, nearly three decades later, William Reilly rues the missed opportunity to address climate change during Bush's presidency. The film aims to create rage and intolerance for denial of truth, encouraging viewers to take action at the ballot box.
Ultimately, The White House Effect shows us a what-if moment from 1988, asking viewers to consider the choices they can make in this current moment.
In 1988, the US was hit by a devastating drought, with crops withering in fields nationwide and dust storms sweeping across the midwest and northern Great Plains. The disaster resulted in an estimated $60 billion in damage, and unrelentingly hot temperatures killed between 5,000 and 10,000 people. Amidst this chaos, then-Ronald Reagan's vice-president George HW Bush met with farmers in Michigan, promising to be the environmental president if elected.
Bush acknowledged the reality of climate change, attributing it to the burning of fossil fuels, which released excess carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. However, he also emphasized that there were those who thought they could do nothing about it, and instead chose to "forget about the White House Effect" - sound environmental policy for leading consumer of fossil fuels.
This clip appears early in The White House Effect, a new documentary examining how Republicans changed course on climate change. The 96-minute film is now available on Netflix, exploring the evolution of the climate crisis from non-partisan reality to divisive political issue.
The documentary takes its name from Bush's unfulfilled promise of environmental action during his presidency. It examines the forces that eroded such purpose, including corporations that downplayed scientific evidence and White House chief of staff John Sununu's power games.
Through meticulously edited archival footage, the film illustrates the politicization of climate change. The filmmakers sorted through 14,000 clips from over 100 sources, including VHS tapes stored in a former Exxon Mobil publicist's garage.
The film highlights Bush's equivocation on climate change by 1990, when he spoke at a White House conference, stating that scientists had "two diametrically opposed points of view" on the issue. This marked a turning point for the US, hamstrung by political division.
Today, nearly three decades later, William Reilly rues the missed opportunity to address climate change during Bush's presidency. The film aims to create rage and intolerance for denial of truth, encouraging viewers to take action at the ballot box.
Ultimately, The White House Effect shows us a what-if moment from 1988, asking viewers to consider the choices they can make in this current moment.