US Military Uses of AI Took a Dramatic Turn in the Past Year, as Companies Like Meta and OpenAI Shifted Their Stance on Using Technology for Military Purposes. In 2022, these companies were united against military use of their tools, but since then, all that has changed. Now, they are quietly rescinding their bans or partnering with the Pentagon.
OpenAI, which was once banned from using AI for "military and warfare" purposes, is now working on several projects with the US defense department. The company has also partnered with Anduril, a defense startup, to provide its AI technology to the military. Meta, another tech giant, has announced that it will allow Llama to be used by select allies in defense operations.
Google has revised its AI principles to permit the development and use of weapons and technologies that may harm people. This shift is attributed to the immense costs involved in building these models, which have made research on general-purpose technologies faster when there's a large, demanding, and income-generating application sector β like the US defense department.
The past few years have dramatically shifted the landscape of capitalist competition from neoliberal free market ideals to geopolitical concerns. The relationships between states and their large technology companies have become central to earlier formations of imperialism.
However, this harmony of interests amongst elite groups has unraveled, leaving behind fragments of potentially new arrangements in both the US and China. The emergence of a new fraction of Silicon Valley capital and a splitting of worldviews amongst the American tech elite is a significant shift.
On one side, there remains a powerful group of tech companies that continue to benefit from globalized digital capitalism. These Big Tech firms have been socially liberal and economically neoliberal but are now aligning with the state via government contracts and a bipolar vision of the global order.
On the other side, there is the growing influence of a newly prominent tech right. This grouping contains radical ideologies and ideas, including techno-monarchist visions and eugenicist views. The new military industrial complex promises a far nimbler set of startups that offer quicker and more adaptive innovation.
The major AI startups have also recently begun pushing the narrative of a zero-sum struggle between the US and China. Some tech companies are using rhetoric about Chinese competition to resist regulation, while others are advocating for a world built around the free flow of goods, services, and data instead.
All of this reflects a major breakdown of the Silicon Valley Consensus. The vaguely socially liberal elements of Silicon Valley are being attacked and replaced with an increasingly virulent right wing that is aligning with the state via government contracts and a bipolar vision of the global order.
OpenAI, which was once banned from using AI for "military and warfare" purposes, is now working on several projects with the US defense department. The company has also partnered with Anduril, a defense startup, to provide its AI technology to the military. Meta, another tech giant, has announced that it will allow Llama to be used by select allies in defense operations.
Google has revised its AI principles to permit the development and use of weapons and technologies that may harm people. This shift is attributed to the immense costs involved in building these models, which have made research on general-purpose technologies faster when there's a large, demanding, and income-generating application sector β like the US defense department.
The past few years have dramatically shifted the landscape of capitalist competition from neoliberal free market ideals to geopolitical concerns. The relationships between states and their large technology companies have become central to earlier formations of imperialism.
However, this harmony of interests amongst elite groups has unraveled, leaving behind fragments of potentially new arrangements in both the US and China. The emergence of a new fraction of Silicon Valley capital and a splitting of worldviews amongst the American tech elite is a significant shift.
On one side, there remains a powerful group of tech companies that continue to benefit from globalized digital capitalism. These Big Tech firms have been socially liberal and economically neoliberal but are now aligning with the state via government contracts and a bipolar vision of the global order.
On the other side, there is the growing influence of a newly prominent tech right. This grouping contains radical ideologies and ideas, including techno-monarchist visions and eugenicist views. The new military industrial complex promises a far nimbler set of startups that offer quicker and more adaptive innovation.
The major AI startups have also recently begun pushing the narrative of a zero-sum struggle between the US and China. Some tech companies are using rhetoric about Chinese competition to resist regulation, while others are advocating for a world built around the free flow of goods, services, and data instead.
All of this reflects a major breakdown of the Silicon Valley Consensus. The vaguely socially liberal elements of Silicon Valley are being attacked and replaced with an increasingly virulent right wing that is aligning with the state via government contracts and a bipolar vision of the global order.