Federal prosecutors are reportedly considering calling San Leandro City Councilman Bryan Azevedo as a witness in the upcoming bribery and fraud trial against former Oakland Mayor Sheng Thao. The revelation emerged during a federal court hearing, where Assistant U.S. Attorney Abraham Fine hinted at broader corruption across the East Bay, particularly in Oakland.
Azevedo, who is due to appear in court on February 12, faces charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and lying to a government agency after allegedly accepting a $2,000 bribe from a fledgling housing company. His defense team has hinted at a possible plea deal, with Azevedo's lawyer stating that his client is "close to reaching a resolution" in his case.
The prospect of Azevedo taking the stand in Thao's trial has raised questions about potential evidence and witness testimony. Thao's attorney, Jeffrey Tsai, revealed that he had sought information from federal prosecutors regarding an unnamed co-conspirator believed to be longtime Oakland political operative Mario Juarez. The alleged corrupt activity involves "unlawful contributions" by straw donors to evade campaign finance regulations.
Prosecutors claim to have evidence suggesting that Andy Duong and others attempted to bribe various city officials, including Thao. This comes as a new development in the ongoing investigation into the Duongs' use of straw donors to funnel money to City Council candidates. The scheme allegedly dates back to 2013, when California Waste Solutions was negotiating with the city to buy and lease land for recycling facilities.
As Thao's trial approaches on October 19, her defense team has focused on discrediting Juarez's credibility, highlighting his lengthy history of criminal charges and civil disputes. Prosecutors maintain that they built most of their case against Thao without Juarez's assistance, stating that they had been investigating the bribery scheme for over a year before speaking to him.
In related news, regulators have accused Andy Duong of orchestrating another elaborate scheme to improve his family's business with local lawmakers and officials by illegally funneling thousands of dollars to campaign chests. The trial will determine the fate of Thao, Jones, and the Duongs, who all plead not guilty to the charges against them.
Azevedo, who is due to appear in court on February 12, faces charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and lying to a government agency after allegedly accepting a $2,000 bribe from a fledgling housing company. His defense team has hinted at a possible plea deal, with Azevedo's lawyer stating that his client is "close to reaching a resolution" in his case.
The prospect of Azevedo taking the stand in Thao's trial has raised questions about potential evidence and witness testimony. Thao's attorney, Jeffrey Tsai, revealed that he had sought information from federal prosecutors regarding an unnamed co-conspirator believed to be longtime Oakland political operative Mario Juarez. The alleged corrupt activity involves "unlawful contributions" by straw donors to evade campaign finance regulations.
Prosecutors claim to have evidence suggesting that Andy Duong and others attempted to bribe various city officials, including Thao. This comes as a new development in the ongoing investigation into the Duongs' use of straw donors to funnel money to City Council candidates. The scheme allegedly dates back to 2013, when California Waste Solutions was negotiating with the city to buy and lease land for recycling facilities.
As Thao's trial approaches on October 19, her defense team has focused on discrediting Juarez's credibility, highlighting his lengthy history of criminal charges and civil disputes. Prosecutors maintain that they built most of their case against Thao without Juarez's assistance, stating that they had been investigating the bribery scheme for over a year before speaking to him.
In related news, regulators have accused Andy Duong of orchestrating another elaborate scheme to improve his family's business with local lawmakers and officials by illegally funneling thousands of dollars to campaign chests. The trial will determine the fate of Thao, Jones, and the Duongs, who all plead not guilty to the charges against them.