EEOC Quietly Hired Lawyer Who Crusaded for Cases of Discrimination Against Men — Including His Own

A former college student who was accused of rape and later sued his university after being suspended has landed a high-profile job at the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Benjamin North, who maintained his innocence throughout the lawsuit, is now serving as an assistant general counsel at the agency.

North's case drew attention last year when he filed a federal lawsuit against Catholic University, alleging that it had discriminated against him in response to the rape allegation. The university eventually reached a settlement with North, agreeing not to enforce certain policies related to sexual misconduct.

Since then, North has become an outspoken advocate for men's rights and has argued that Title IX, the law that prohibits sex discrimination in federally funded education, is often misused to target male students accused of sexual assault. He has also written op-eds criticizing the EEOC's handling of cases related to sex and gender.

North's appointment at the EEOC has raised concerns among some experts, who see his views as potentially hostile to the agency's mission to enforce anti-discrimination laws. "Given that we are the agency tasked with enforcing protections against sexual violence in the workplace, it sends a concerning signal to have hired somebody with his background," said an EEOC employee.

The EEOC has recently shifted its priorities under Chair Andrea Lucas, who has emphasized defending biological and binary reality of sex and rooting out "unlawful DEI-motivated" race and sex discrimination. However, the agency's actions have been met with criticism from some advocates for workers' rights and civil liberties groups.

North's appointment comes amid a broader trend of conservative voices being appointed to senior roles within the EEOC during the Trump administration. Last year, Lucas hired Shannon Royce, a longtime Christian conservative activist, as her chief of staff. Royce had previously sued the agency over its handling of cases related to trans workers and abortion care.

The EEOC's new direction under Lucas has been criticized by some for being too focused on issues like biological sex and religious bias, which some argue may undermine efforts to protect workers from discrimination based on their actual characteristics or experiences. The agency's actions have sparked debate about the role of politics in enforcing civil rights laws.
 
I'm really worried about this one 🤕... I mean, Benjamin North just landed a super important job at the EEOC but his views on sex and gender are kinda problematic 😳. He thinks Title IX is often misused to target guys accused of rape, which is just not true in my opinion 🙅‍♂️. And now he's gonna be part of the agency that's supposed to enforce anti-discrimination laws? It feels like a step back for me 👎. I'm all about promoting equality and justice, but when people with these kinds of views are in positions of power, it can be really tough to know what's going on 🤔. The EEOC needs to focus on protecting people from actual discrimination, not just the kind that's based on who you are 💖.
 
🤔 i think its pretty messed up that benjamin north is getting a job at the us eeoC considering his views on men's rights and how he's been using his platform to argue that title ix is being misused against male students accused of sexual assault 🚫 it just feels like hes going to use this position to undermine the very laws thats meant to protect people from discrimination in the workplace. plus with chair andrea lucas pushing for a more conservative approach on issues like biological sex and religious bias, its creating a super polarized environment where not everyone feels safe or supported 🤷‍♂️
 
🤔 I'm so concerned about this recent appointment at the EEOC... like, what's going on? 🤷‍♀️ Benjamin North's views on Title IX and sex discrimination are kinda problematic, don't you think? 🙅‍♂️ He's basically an advocate for men's rights, which could lead to some serious pushback from marginalized communities. #NotMyEEOC 💔 Meanwhile, the EEOC is supposed to be about enforcing anti-discrimination laws, but with this new direction under Chair Lucas, it feels like they're playing politics instead of protecting workers' rights. 🤦‍♀️ I just hope they realize that sex discrimination isn't always about biological sex, you know? #SexIsNotABinary 🚫 The EEOC's actions have the power to make or break people's lives, and we need to be careful not to undermine their efforts to protect workers from harassment and assault. 💪
 
This is a total joke 🤣... I mean, who would hire someone with a history of rape allegations and a radical men's rights agenda to work for the EEOC? It's like inviting a fox to guard the henhouse 🐓😂. The agency's new direction under Chair Lucas is trying to balance protecting workers from discrimination, but this guy coming on board just throws everything into chaos. I guess you could say it's a perfect example of how not to enforce anti-discrimination laws 😂.
 
🤔 I'm not sure how comfortable I am with this appointment... Benjamin North's views on Title IX and sex discrimination seem a bit... problematic 🚫. He's an outspoken advocate for men's rights, which can be a red flag when you're working at the EEOC. It feels like he's more interested in defending guys accused of rape than protecting survivors 😔. And with his history of suing universities over sexual misconduct allegations, it's hard to trust him on this issue 🤷‍♂️. I hope Chair Lucas is aware of the potential implications of having someone with these views on her team 💡. Can't help but wonder if politics are getting in the way of protecting workers from real discrimination 👀.
 
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this one 🤔. So, Benjamin North gets a job at the EEOC after being accused of rape and suing his university... it just doesn't add up, you know? I mean, I get that people can make mistakes, but this is like, the agency tasked with protecting people from discrimination, not covering its own backside 🙄. And now he's an advocate for men's rights and criticizing the EEOC's handling of sex and gender cases... it's like, isn't his own history a bit of a conflict of interest? 😒. And don't even get me started on this shift towards "biological reality" and whatnot... it feels like they're trying to erase people's identities and experiences 🚫. I guess we'll just have to wait and see how things play out, but for now, I'm not feeling very optimistic 😐.
 
🤔 This is just another example of how politics can influence hiring decisions and shape the direction of institutions like the EEOC. I mean, think about it - we've got a guy who was accused of rape and still managed to land a job at the agency that's supposed to protect women from harassment. It's not exactly a ringing endorsement of his character, right? 🙄

And then there's the fact that he's been making waves with his men's rights advocacy and criticizing Title IX. I get it, some guys have been unfairly targeted by these laws, but does that mean we need to water them down or make exceptions for people who've committed serious crimes? It just doesn't sit right with me.

And let's not forget about the EEOC's new direction under Chair Lucas and the appointment of Shannon Royce as her chief of staff. This is a case where I think it's really important to consider the impact on marginalized communities and whether these appointments are helping or hindering their progress. 🤝
 
I'm perplexed by this development - an individual with a history of rape allegations and a contentious lawsuit against his university, now serving as an assistant general counsel at the EEOC 🤔. It seems counterintuitive that someone with such a checkered past would be appointed to a role tasked with enforcing anti-discrimination laws, particularly those related to sex and gender.

The concerns surrounding North's views on Title IX and the EEOC's handling of cases are valid, as his stance on these issues may be perceived as hostile to the agency's mission 🚫. It's also telling that this appointment comes amidst a broader trend of conservative voices being appointed to senior roles within the EEOC during the Trump administration.

One has to wonder whether politics is indeed influencing the agency's priorities and whether this shift will ultimately undermine efforts to protect workers from discrimination based on their actual characteristics or experiences 🤝. I think it would be beneficial for the EEOC to take a step back and reevaluate its priorities, ensuring that its focus remains on promoting equality and justice for all employees 📚.
 
I gotta say, this is a super messed up situation 🤯. A guy who got accused of rape and then became a men's rights advocate gets a job at an agency that's supposed to protect people from discrimination? It just feels like he's getting away with something 🙅‍♂️. I mean, I get that everyone deserves a second chance, but this is the EEOC we're talking about - they're not exactly known for being sympathetic to people who have committed serious crimes.

And it's also worrying that his views are going to influence their policies and decisions. Like, if he thinks Title IX is being misused against men, then maybe he'll push for changes that benefit him or other guys who've been accused of similar things 🤦‍♂️. It's like, can't we just focus on creating a safe and respectful environment for everyone? Not just the ones who are accused of doing something wrong? 🤷‍♀️

I guess what really gets me is that this guy was able to use his lawsuit against Catholic University to get ahead in life. Like, he filed a federal lawsuit because he felt like his university had discriminated against him... but then he goes on to become an advocate for the very same thing he claimed was being done to him? It just feels like he's playing the system 🎲.

Anyway, I guess what I'm trying to say is that this whole situation just feels super off to me 😒. Can't we just try to do better than this? 🤞
 
[Image of a man with a confused expression, holding a sign that says "What happened?"]

[GIF of a rollercoaster with a speedometer showing 100mph, followed by a red flag waving in slow motion]

[Image of a scale with one side labeled "Progress" and the other side labeled "Setback", with a broken chain symbolizing a lawsuit]

[GIF of a news anchor looking at a screen with a "BREAKING NEWS" ticker, followed by a "What's Going On?" emoticon]

[Image of a person shrugging, with a thought bubble containing a question mark]

[GIF of a hand holding a stop sign, with a red flag in the background]
 
I'm really concerned about this appointment 🤔. I mean, North has been a vocal advocate for men's rights and has argued that Title IX is often misused to target male students accused of sexual assault. But as an assistant general counsel at the EEOC, he's now supposed to be enforcing anti-discrimination laws that protect everyone, regardless of their sex or gender identity 🤷‍♀️.

It feels like a huge hypocrisy, especially considering the agency's new direction under Chair Lucas, which seems to be shifting the focus towards biological sex and religious bias. I worry that this will undermine efforts to protect workers from discrimination based on their actual characteristics or experiences 💔.

I'm not saying North is a bad person or anything, but I think his views are problematic and could potentially harm people who need protection under Title IX 🤝. It's like he's playing both sides - advocating for men's rights on one hand, but now getting to work at an agency that's supposed to be fighting against sex discrimination on the other 😕.

I'd love to see more transparency around Lucas's vision for the EEOC and how it aligns with the agency's mission 📊. Until then, I'm just going to keep a close eye on this situation 👀.
 
🤔 So I was reading this news and I just want to draw a diagram to show my thought process...

+-----------------------+
| EEOC |
| (Equal Emplmnt |
| Opportunity Comm.)|
+-----------------------+
|
|
v
+-----------------------+
| New direction |
| under Chair Lucas |
| (defending biol sex |
| and binary reality)|
+-----------------------+
|
|
v
+-----------------------+ +---------------+
| Criticized by | | Critics of |
| worker rights | | Lucas's |
| groups | | direction |
+-----------------------+ +---------------+
| |
v |
+-----------------------+ +---------------+
| Potential issues | | With EEOC |
| with Title IX | | actions |
+-----------------------+ +---------------+

I'm not sure about this new direction at the EEOC... it seems like they're focusing too much on biological sex and binary reality, which might undermine efforts to protect workers from discrimination based on their actual characteristics or experiences. 🤷‍♀️
 
🤦‍♂️[Image of a guy looking at his watch with a "I'm running late" expression, but actually just realizing he got a job at EEOC and has no idea what to do 😅]

🚫💁‍♀️[GIF of a hand waving goodbye with a red X marked through it]

😂👀[Image of a man in a suit looking shocked with his mouth hanging open, like " Wait, what?!"]

🤔💡[GIF of a lightbulb turning on, but instead it's just a sad face with a few sparks flying off]

🚫💥[Image of an explosion with the words "EEOC drama" written in bold letters]
 
💼👀 I don't think it's a good idea for someone with his background to be working at an agency that's supposed to be all about protecting people from discrimination 🤔. I mean, he's been vocal about his views on Title IX and sex in general, which seem kinda anti-feminist to me 😒. The EEOC is already under fire for their new direction under Chair Lucas, and hiring someone like North might just make things worse 👎. It's one thing to be an advocate for men's rights, but it's another thing entirely to have that kind of influence over a major agency like the EEOC 🚨.
 
this is a huge red flag 🚨💔 i mean come on who appoints someone with a history of suing over being accused of rape and now works at an org that's supposed to protect people from harassment? it's like they're handing him the keys to the kingdom 🔑 and this just shows how far the conservatives have gotten in infiltrating these institutions. i'm all for due process and not jumping to conclusions but this guy's whole thing is that he was unfairly targeted as a male victim of rape... meanwhile women are still being harassed and assaulted and no one seems to care 🤷‍♀️
 
omg this is so sus 🤔 how can someone who was accused of rape and thinks its a woman's fault get hired by the EEOC? like what kind of logic does that make? i mean i know he said he was innocent but his whole thing about title ix being misused against men just feels like victim blaming to me 🙄. plus his views on biological sex and binary reality are straight out of a bad christian nationalist textbook 📚. the EEOC is supposed to be about protecting people from discrimination not perpetuating hate speech 💔. this appointment just gives me hope that there are still some folks out there who are all about playing both sides against each other 😒
 
Ugh, this guy North is literally everywhere now 😒. First he's suing a university over being suspended for allegedly raping someone, then he gets a job at the EEOC and starts spewing his radical views on sex and gender 🤦‍♂️. It's like he thinks he can just waltz in and turn the whole agency into a right-wing propaganda mill 💸. I mean, come on, dude, you're an assistant general counsel? How about using your actual expertise to help people rather than spreading hate speech online 😒. And what's with this "biological reality of sex" nonsense? Can't we just acknowledge that human experience comes in all shapes and sizes without trying to fit it into some narrow, outdated definition? 🤷‍♀️ It's like the EEOC has lost its mind over here 👀.
 
🤔 this is super concerning... think its a huge mistake that they hired him... doesnt seem like someone who would be neutral or fair about these things... his whole thing is that Title IX is misused against men, but he's been accused of rape and sued his uni for being suspended... how can we trust him to defend sex discrimination laws? 🙅‍♂️ the EEOC is supposed to protect everyone from workplace harassment and discrimination, not just for women or minorities but also for ppl who actually do commit abuse or harassment... this guy's views seem all about making himself feel less guilty or accountable for his actions. dont think its a good idea at all 😐
 
Back
Top