E-bike riders will need licenses in NJ as ex-Gov. Murphy rides into the sunset

New Jersey is cracking down on e-bike riders, requiring them to get licenses in an effort to curb crashes that have been increasing in recent months. Governor Phil Murphy signed the bill into law, bringing it one step closer to making roads safer for all users.

The new regulations classify all forms of e-bikes as motorized bicycles, which some cycling advocates say is unfair to low-speed "class 1" e-bikes that go under 20 miles per hour. These bikes, which are designed for short trips and commuting, will now be lumped together with higher-speed vehicles, making it seem like they're just as much of a safety risk.

But Governor Murphy argues that the law is necessary to address growing concerns over e-bike safety. "It's clear that we need to take action to prevent tragedies from occurring," he said in a statement. "Making our roads safer for all users has been a key priority for my administration."

Under the new law, e-bike owners and operators will be required to get licenses - either a motorized bicycle license if they're under 17 or a standard driver's license if they're over 17. They'll also need to register their bikes with the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission and insure them.

The restrictions don't stop there. Highways with speed limits over 50 miles per hour will be off-limits to e-bikes, and riders must obtain licenses within six months of the law taking effect or by July 19, whichever comes first.

But not everyone is happy with the new regulations. The New Jersey Bike and Walk Coalition has spoken out against the bill, arguing that it unnecessarily restricts low-speed e-bikes and makes it harder for people to use them as a safe alternative to driving cars. "It creates a whole lot of problems for people unnecessarily," said Debra Kagan, executive director of the coalition. "Restricting the use of low speed e-bikes for transportation is not the solution. It gets people out of cars and should be an important part of our state goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions."
 
Ugh, great, another law to tell me how to live my life πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. I get that safety first and all, but come on, can't they just make it clear that low-speed e-bikes are not a menace? It's like they're gonna single out the elderly ladies who ride around town because they need some exercise πŸ˜’. And what's up with the highways thing? Like, I don't wanna be stuck in traffic, but banning e-bikes altogether just seems unnecessary πŸš—. Maybe they should focus on making those cars safer instead of regulating us cyclists πŸ›΄οΈ. It's all about finding a balance, right? Not too much freedom, not too little regulation... seems like they're taking it to the other extreme πŸ˜’.
 
I mean, I get where Governor Murphy's coming from, but don't think this law is gonna solve everything πŸš²πŸ’‘... those low-speed e-bikes are already super safe, you know? They're like the buses of cycling πŸšŒπŸ‘. Class 1 e-bikes go under 20 miles per hour, that's slower than a lot of pedestrians walking around! πŸƒβ€β™€οΈ

But, I guess it's one of those "better safe than sorry" kinda deals... πŸ€”... at least the new law requires licenses and registration for all e-bikes, so we can keep track of who's on the road πŸ“.

I'm still not sure about this though... πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ highways with speed limits over 50 miles per hour being off-limits to e-bikes? That just seems like a hassle 🚫. Low-speed e-bikes should be allowed on those roads, it's not like they're gonna hurt anyone at that speed 😊.

I've been seeing more and more people using e-bikes as their primary mode of transportation, and I think this law might actually push some people back into cars... which is the opposite of what we want πŸš—.
 
omg i feel so bad for those low-speed ebike riders πŸ€• they're already stuck with having to follow all these rules now they're gonna have to get licenses too? it's like, come on nj what's the harm in just letting people use them as a fun way to get around πŸš΄β€β™€οΈ? and btw governor murphy is being super out of touch by lumping those bikes in with higher speed ones... 1st world problems right there πŸ˜’
 
I'm all about those eco-friendly ways to get around πŸš΄β€β™€οΈ, but I gotta say, this NJ law is kinda harsh. I mean, what's wrong with a lil' speed, right? Those low-speed e-bikes are perfect for short trips and commuting - they're not gonna hurt anyone πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. And now they're just lumped in with those fast-moving bikes, like it's all the same thing... no thanks! 🚫 I can see why the Bike and Walk Coalition is speaking out against this - it does feel like a step back for people who want to use e-bikes as an alternative to driving. And what about all the pros they bring? Reduced emissions, less traffic congestion... it's not just about safety, you know? 🌎
 
Ugh, this is so unfair 🀯! I mean, I get it that safety first, but do they have to make it so complicated? Those low-speed e-bikes are literally designed for short trips and commuting, what's the point of requiring a license? It's like saying a Vespa needs a full driver's license just because it has an engine πŸš΄β€β™‚οΈπŸ˜’. And now people who use them as a sustainable alternative to cars are being penalized too. The bike coalition is right, this bill does more harm than good πŸ’”. Why not have designated bike lanes or safety courses instead of ruining the whole e-bike scene? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ This is just going to drive all the cool kids out of buying e-bikes and into cars...
 
πŸš΄β€β™‚οΈ I'm kinda worried about this new law πŸ€”. While it's true that crashes have been on the rise, I think classifying all e-bikes as motorized bicycles is a bit harsh 😬. Those low-speed "class 1" bikes are designed for short trips and commuting - they're super safe! πŸšΆβ€β™€οΈ. By lumping them together with higher-speed vehicles, it's like saying they're just as much of a safety risk 🚫. I get that Governor Murphy wants to make roads safer, but can't we find a better solution? Maybe some education and awareness campaigns instead of stricter regulations? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ It's not about making e-bikes seem less safe, it's about giving people options for getting around without being stuck in cars πŸš—. And what about the environmental impact? 🌎 Restricting low-speed e-bikes could actually increase greenhouse gas emissions πŸ‘€. I hope there are some compromises to be made before this law goes into effect πŸ’‘.
 
I think this new law in New Jersey is kinda crazy! I mean, e-bikes are already a great way to get around, especially for short trips, but now they're gonna have to deal with all these restrictions. It's like, what's the point of having an e-bike if you can't even ride it on some highways? πŸš΄β€β™‚οΈ It just seems like they're trying to stifle innovation and make things harder for people who want to use e-bikes as a sustainable option.

And I get why Governor Murphy wants to improve safety, but shouldn't there be a way to balance that with being all inclusive? Like, what about the low-speed "class 1" e-bikes that are actually designed for those short trips? Do they really need licenses and insurance too? πŸ€” It just seems like this law is gonna end up hurting more people than it's helping.
 
I don't know, man... πŸ€” I think it's a good idea to crack down on e-bike riders, especially if they're causing crashes. I mean, safety is super important, right? 😬 But at the same time, I feel like this new law is kinda harsh on low-speed e-bikes. Like, what's the big deal? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ They're not speeding around or anything... πŸš΄β€β™€οΈ

I guess Governor Murphy just wants to make sure everyone is safe on the roads, but shouldn't he be looking at ways to educate people instead of just restricting their use of e-bikes? πŸ€” I mean, what about bike safety courses or something? πŸ’‘ That would probably be way more effective than a license requirement.

And, honestly, I kinda agree with the New Jersey Bike and Walk Coalition. 🀝 Restricting low-speed e-bikes doesn't seem like the most logical solution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions... 🌎 Unless they can figure out a way to make it work for everyone? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
Idk about this new law in New Jersey πŸ€”... I mean, on one hand, safety first, right? But at the same time, low-speed e-bikes are super useful for short trips and commuting. It's like they're just trying to cater to all the high-speed thrill-seekers πŸš΄β€β™‚οΈ who don't care about traffic congestion or parking woes.

And what about people with disabilities? They often rely on those low-speed e-bikes for independence and mobility. Is it really fair to lump them in with everyone else? πŸ’” It's like they're trying to make roads safer for some, but not others.

I guess it's all about finding that balance between safety and practicality πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ... But I don't know if this law is the right solution. Maybe we need to rethink our approach to e-bike regulations instead of just throwing more rules at them πŸš—πŸ’¨
 
πŸš΄β€β™‚οΈ The recent push to regulate e-bikes in New Jersey has sparked a debate about safety vs convenience, with many arguing that low-speed "class 1" e-bikes are unfairly classified as motorized bicycles. πŸ€” This law change could disproportionately affect seniors and those with mobility issues who rely on these bikes for short trips and commuting. πŸ‘΅πŸ» While Governor Murphy's intention to improve road safety is understandable, it's concerning that the solution may inadvertently limit access to a safer alternative to driving cars. πŸ’¨ The six-month registration period also poses logistical challenges for individuals who need to acquire licenses quickly. πŸ•’ Ultimately, finding a balance between safety and accessibility will be crucial in determining the effectiveness of this new law. πŸ‘
 
So now e-bikes need licenses too... like it's really that hard to follow traffic rules πŸ™„. And what's with the highway ban? I mean, I've seen some crazy stuff on the NJ Turnpike but at least I knew which lane to stay out of πŸ˜‚. It's all about making roads "safer" for everyone, right? Not just for the people who are actually driving cars πŸ™ƒ. And what's wrong with low-speed e-bikes being lumped in with regular bikes? It sounds like they're trying to make a point that e-bikes aren't as safe as they claim... or maybe it's just easier to regulate them out of existence πŸ€”.
 
πŸš«πŸ’” another state in the US is cracking down on e-bikes, requiring licenses and registration πŸ“πŸ˜¬ this is so unfair to low-speed "class 1" e-bikes that are perfect for short trips and commuting πŸš΄β€β™€οΈ they'll be lumped together with higher-speed vehicles now πŸ˜’ governor murphy says it's necessary to address safety concerns but what about the people who just want a safe way to get around on their own terms? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ this law is gonna make e-bikes more expensive and less accessible for low-income families πŸ‘₯ and it's not like they're going to solve the safety issues anyway πŸš«πŸ‘Ž
 
πŸ€” this whole thing feels off to me... like they're trying to control us or something 🚲 i mean, I get that accidents are a problem, but do we really need licenses and registration? it just seems like another way for the government to keep tabs on us πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™€οΈ and what's with the highway restrictions? it's not like e-bikes are gonna be speeding down there anyway πŸš— 50 miles per hour is pretty slow, if you ask me. I think they're just trying to push people towards cars instead of promoting a safer alternative 🌎
 
I dont think its a good idea to make ebike riders get licenses like motorized bike riders... πŸ€” they're way safer than cars lol. What's next? making us wear helmets just to ride to the corner store? πŸš΄β€β™€οΈ e-bikes are already way more eco-friendly and convenient than driving a car... we should be encouraging people to use them more, not restricting their use πŸ˜’
 
Back
Top