Clive Palmer denies Steve Bannon's claim he was behind billionaire's controversial 2019 Australian election ad strategy

Australian Billionaire Clive Palmer's Campaign Strategy Was Not Orchestrated by Far-Right Strategist Steve Bannon, According to Palmer's Spokesman.

In a shocking development, far-right political strategist Steve Bannon recently claimed that he was behind billionaire Clive Palmer's $60 million advertising strategy at the 2019 Australian federal election. However, this claim has been vehemently denied by Palmer's spokesman, Andrew Crook, who described it as "made-up" and "just bull**t".

According to a text conversation between Bannon and an individual linked to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein that was released by the US Department of Justice, Bannon made the alleged claim about orchestrating Palmer's advertising strategy. However, the claims are untested and have been met with skepticism.

In the days following the 2019 Australian election, which saw the Coalition government return despite polls pointing to a Labor victory, Palmer pivoted his campaign strategy to "polarise the electorate" and damage Labor's chances of winning. The campaign was marked by an unprecedented ad blitz by Palmer's United Australia party, which ran a series of ads attacking Labor leader Bill Shorten.

Palmer's advertising spend was heavily criticized for its impact on public discourse, with some labeling it as a "bizarre" exercise in demonizing the opposition. In fact, Labor's election review cited the negative effect of Palmer's advertising on Shorten's popularity and the party's primary vote.

Bannon, who has been described as a promoter of misinformation, had previously discussed the campaign strategy during an interview with the Sydney Morning Herald, where he stated that he was surprised at the lack of reference to China in the campaign. However, his comments were largely drowned out by Palmer's aggressive advertising tactics.

As the controversy surrounding Bannon's claims continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how much credibility will attach to these allegations. In the meantime, Palmer's spokesman has remained steadfast in denying any involvement by Bannon or Epstein in the 2019 Australian election campaign strategy.
 
can u believe this guy clive palmer is even trying to spin this now πŸ™„ after all those shady ads during the 2019 election his team just denies steve bannon was involved but come on we all know how these guys operate πŸ’ΈπŸ‘€ and what's really sad is that it seems like labors loss still has a negative impact on their campaign strategy lol poor labour party πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ anyway u think palmer will be able to bounce back from this or is he just a one trick pony πŸ˜’
 
so like I'm trying to wrap my head around this whole thing and I thought steve bannon was all about spreading misinformation anyway πŸ€” so it doesn't really surprise me that he'd claim to be behind clive palmer's ad blitz... but the thing is, clive palmer's people are being super clear that they didn't work with him on it which seems legit to me. I mean, if bannon was indeed involved, wouldn't his people have said something by now? it just feels like a weird coincidence that he's claiming credit for it after the fact πŸ€‘
 
OMG this is crazy!!! 🀯 I mean Clive Palmer just denies everything and Andrew Crook is all like "it's made-up" and I'm over here thinking what even is going on?! πŸ˜‚ Steve Bannon seems like he's trying to stir up drama again, but at the same time it's kinda fishy how the texts came out. Can we get a straight answer from Palmer or anyone involved? πŸ€”
 
πŸ€” this whole thing is like a big game of "who can spin it the most" πŸ”„ palmer's team thinks they're above all criticism and now they're trying to turn the tables on Bannon πŸ˜’ but honestly, can we trust anyone in politics these days? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ at the end of the day, it's all just about winning elections and who gets to make the money πŸ’Έ but what really hurts is that people are being pawns in a much bigger game without even realizing it 🎲
 
Ugh, this just gets better and better 🀣. So now Clive Palmer is trying to distance himself from Steve Bannon, but I bet he was totally on board with the plan and just didn't want to take all the heat for it πŸ˜‚. And honestly, who comes up with this stuff? A text conversation between Bannon and some guy linked to Epstein? Come on! That's not exactly the most credible evidence πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. Palmer's campaign strategy was pretty cringeworthy anyway, especially targeting Shorten like that... just a bunch of mudslinging ads πŸ’”. I'm not buying the "made-up" and "bull**t" defense from Andrew Crook either πŸ˜’. Just another example of politicians trying to spin their way out of trouble πŸ”„.
 
I'm low-key surprised this isn't coming as a shock to more ppl 🀯. I mean, we all know Steve Bannon is some sketchy stuff, and it sounds like Palmer's camp was just trying to deflect blame for their own advertising tactics going haywire πŸ˜’. It's also wild that they'd go from "we didn't orchestrate our ad strategy" to now playing the victim πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. Either way, this whole thing is a mess and I'm not sure who's coming out on top in the end πŸ€‘
 
idk man... I just read that Clive Palmer's campaign strategist wasn't even a far-right dude like Steve Bannon lol what is going on with this guy? πŸ€” Palmer's spokesman is saying it was all made-up and BS, but then there's this text convo that came out showing Bannon said he did the whole thing πŸ“± meanwhile, I'm still salty about how much Palmer spent on ads that were super negative towards Labor πŸ€‘ and now we're just wondering who to believe... Bannon or not? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ I mean, what even is the goal here? πŸ€”
 
Ugh I am literally so done with this whole thing 🀯 I mean can't we just focus on something else for once?! So Clive Palmer just out and out denies that Steve Bannon had anything to do with his crazy ad blitz in 2019 and now everyone's all skeptical because of some text message from the US Department of Justice... like come on guys can't we have one rational conversation without all this drama?! 😩 And then there's the whole thing about Palmer trying to polarize the electorate and damage Labor's chances... I mean I get it, he wanted to win but did he really have to resort to such underhanded tactics?! πŸ™„ It just feels like everyone's more interested in tearing each other down than actually talking about what matters. The ads were definitely negative and hurtful, even if they didn't necessarily change the outcome of the election... can we please just move on from this and talk about something else that doesn't involve such toxic politics?! πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ
 
πŸ€” I'm not surprised that Steve Bannon's claim about orchestrating Clive Palmer's ad blitz is being shot down. It sounds like a typical move for someone with a history of spreading misinformation πŸ™„. The fact that Palmer's camp is pushing back so hard suggests to me that they might know more than they're letting on... or maybe they just don't want anyone to think their tactics were as crazy as they actually were πŸ˜…. Anyway, it's interesting to see how this whole thing plays out. I'm definitely going to be keeping an eye on this one πŸ“Š.
 
Back
Top