California reservoir water levels 2 months before wildfire season starts

California's reservoir water levels are being closely monitored two months before wildfire season, with officials looking at snowpack, weather forecasts, and forest conditions to gauge the risk of fires. However, a spokesperson for California's Department of Water Resources (DWR) downplayed the importance of reservoir levels in determining wildfire risk across the state.

"Reservoir levels don't have an impact on wildfire risk in California," the DWR official said. Instead, dry grasses and vegetation are more likely to ignite fires, elevating the risk of wildfires. Firefighters may occasionally pull water from reservoirs when fighting fires, but it depends on proximity.

State fire officials expect wildfire risk to remain near normal for the foreseeable future, according to a four-month outlook from the Wildfire Forecast and Threat Intelligence Integration Center (WFTIIC). The outlook notes that significant fire potential will be normal across the state for February through May, with data from the DWR playing an important role in the assessment.

The water level of all major reservoirs in California is currently at 100% or higher of their historical average, according to DWR data. Lake Cachuma in Southern California has the lowest levels, while Lake Oroville and New Melones Lake in Northern and Central California, respectively, are among the top performers.

Despite these numbers, January was abnormally dry, with snowpack levels at only 59% of average. However, national weather service predictions indicate a change in the state's weather pattern, with back-to-back storms expected to hit this week and into the weekend.

The Wildfire Forecast and Threat Intelligence Integration Center (WFTIIC) outlook notes that Northern California can expect more storms once March hits, while Southern California will face above-normal temperatures and below-normal precipitation. Fire threat in both regions is expected to remain near normal, although May may be a transitional month with increasing fire potential.

Overall, the data suggests that wildfire risk remains a concern in California, but the outlook indicates that it will not be as severe as previously anticipated.
 
I'm still kinda surprised that they're saying reservoir levels aren't really the deal when it comes to determining wildfire risk πŸ€”... I mean, if we're already at 100% capacity and snowpack is only at 59%, doesn't that sound like a pretty big fire hazard waiting to happen? 🌳πŸ”₯ And what's with the dry grasses and stuff being more of an issue? Can't they just pull water from the reservoirs when needed? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ It seems kinda like we're just winging it without a solid plan in place.
 
πŸ€” So, you're telling me reservoir water levels aren't the real deal when it comes to predicting wildfires in Cali? That's kinda like saying the economy doesn't matter, or that public health is overrated... πŸ™„ It just seems weird to downplay something as basic as reservoir levels. I mean, what about all those folks who rely on those reservoirs for their daily lives? Don't they deserve some assurance that the water will be there when they need it? And now you're saying dry grasses and vegetation are more likely to ignite fires? That's a whole different can of worms... πŸš’ Fire politics, if you ask me! 😏
 
Reservoir levels being monitored like they don't mean squat πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. I mean, who needs water when you've got dry grasses and vegetation just begging to catch fire πŸ”₯? And yeah, sure, firefighters might need a little H2O now and then, but only if it's really close by πŸ’¦. Still, 100% of historical average or whatever that means... sounds like we're good to go πŸ™„. Oh wait, there was an abnormally dry January... 🀯 guess that changes things a teensy bit. Back-to-back storms incoming? Better luck next time, CA πŸŒͺ️.
 
I'm still kinda puzzled by this one πŸ€”... so reservoir levels aren't really gonna make or break wildfires, huh? I get what they're saying about dry grasses and stuff being more of a risk, but isn't water also like, super important for fires or something? Like, it's not just about the dryness of the plants, but also how much fuel is available to spread the fire in the first place?

And yeah, I know reservoir levels are at 100% or higher now, but that's like, a pretty big pool of water we're talking about here 🌊. It seems kinda weird that officials are downplaying their importance. Maybe they're just trying to focus on other factors? But still, you gotta wonder if having more water around could help prevent some of these fires from getting outta control...

And what's with the outlook saying wildfire risk will be near normal for February through May? That sounds kinda sketchy to me 😐... isn't it always fire season at least a little bit somewhere in California by that point? But I guess we'll just have to wait and see how things play out.
 
I'm so sure reservoir levels are super important for predicting wildfires... I mean, they're definitely playing a role πŸ€”. But at the same time, dry grasses and vegetation are probably the real deal-breakers when it comes to fires 🌿. Like, even if the water level is at 100% or higher, which is crazy high btw 😲, if the conditions are just right for a spark, you're still looking at trouble πŸ”₯. On the other hand, I'm not buying that reservoir levels don't matter... like, what about all those times firefighters need to pull water from them when they're fighting fires? That's gotta count for something πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. And have you seen the numbers on Lake Cachuma lately? It's like, woah 😲. But I guess we'll just have to wait and see how these storms roll in... or not πŸ’¦πŸŒ¨οΈ
 
πŸŒΏπŸ’¦ omg can u believe they're saying reservoir levels don't matter that much? like, i get it if dry grasses are more likely to ignite fires and all... πŸ€” but what about when we've had abnormally dry januarys and low snowpack? shouldn't that be a bigger concern? 🌈 anyway, sounds like things might not be as bad as ppl thought, but still gotta stay vigilant πŸš’πŸ’¦
 
I'm a bit confused about this water levels thing... isn't having reservoirs at 100% or higher supposed to help prevent wildfires? I mean, if we've got enough water, shouldn't we be safe from fires? πŸ€” But apparently, the DWR official says it's not that big of a deal. What's going on here? Is dry grass and stuff more likely to start fires? And what's with all these forecasts and centers... does someone actually get paid to watch the weather? πŸŒͺ️
 
πŸ€” I feel like reservoir levels are kinda the canary in the coal mine for wildfires in Cali πŸŒ³πŸ’§... don't get me wrong, dry grasses and vegetation are def a bigger risk factor, but if you look at the overall picture, it's all about how much water is stored up before winter hits ❄️. I mean, 100% or higher of historical average? That's not just good luck, that's a deliberate effort to prepare for the worst πŸ™... and if they're already pulling water from reservoirs when fires start, shouldn't we be paying more attention to the levels in the first place? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ Not saying it's all about the water, but I think it's worth considering, you know? πŸ€“
 
California's reservoirs are like a ticking time bomb πŸŒͺ️ - we've got 100% water levels, but dry conditions and weather forecasts are what really matter πŸ”₯πŸ’¦.

It's crazy how fire officials downplay reservoir levels, but I get it, grasses are the real enemy of wildfires πŸ”ͺ. Still, these high reservoir levels give me hope that we might not be facing a monster fire season this year πŸ™.
 
πŸŒ³πŸ’§ think they're underestimating this thing... reservoir levels matter, esp with snowpack being only 59% of average last jan πŸ€• and now we got back-to-back storms comin' in πŸŒͺ️ might actually help keep things under control, but also could stir up dry stuff if the storms are too intense β›ˆοΈ. don't know what's more worrying, wildland fires or drought πŸ€”
 
I'm still trying to get my head around this one... so reservoir water levels aren't really a big deal when it comes to wildfires? πŸ€” like they just don't have any impact on the whole situation at all? That's kinda weird, right? I mean, wouldn't having enough water help prevent fires from getting out of control?

And what about Lake Cachuma being the lowest level? Like, does that actually make a difference or is it just a tiny little drop in an already massive reservoir? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ Also, those back-to-back storms sound like they could really kick some fire season into high gear! Do you think the DWR's data will change as more info comes in? πŸ“Š
 
I'm not buying what they're selling πŸ€”. Those reservoir levels are way too high to just ignore them. I mean, even if dry grasses and vegetation are more likely to ignite fires, having extra water stored up can definitely help firefighters contain blazes when they do happen. Plus, the fact that snowpack levels were only at 59% of average last month is a major red flag 🌨️. And don't even get me started on those back-to-back storms expected this week – it's like nature is trying to tell us something! πŸ’₯ The WFTIIC outlook might say wildfire risk will remain near normal, but I think that's being way too optimistic ☁️.
 
Ugh, reservoir water levels? Really? πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ Like they're just gonna magically make all these fires disappear or something. I get it, dry grasses and veg are more of a risk factor... but c'mon, you can't even use some of that stored water to, like, create a firebreak or something when needed? πŸ€” It's not like the reservoirs are just sitting there collecting dust. And what about all those fires in the past where they HAD to pull water from these reservoirs? Did no one learn anything? πŸ˜’
 
🌳πŸ”₯ I think reservoir levels do matter, but they're not the only thing to consider. If water levels are low, it's like putting out fires before they even start - we need to keep those reservoirs topped up so firefighters can respond quickly when a fire does break out. Plus, dry conditions everywhere don't help... it's all about being prepared πŸŒŠπŸ’¦
 
You know how we've been talking about droughts and wildfires for ages πŸŒͺ️? It's crazy to think reservoir levels aren't even considered when predicting wildfire risk... I mean, like what's up with that? The water level of all major reservoirs is at 100% or higher, but January was super dry πŸŒ€. And now we're expecting storms in Northern Cali, which should help a bit. But honestly, it feels like the weather pattern is still pretty unpredictable β›ˆοΈ... and fire season is just around the corner πŸ”₯. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that it's not as bad as everyone's worried about 🀞.
 
πŸŒ³πŸ’§ So I was reading about how reservoir water levels in Cali are being watched like hawks two months before wildfire season and I'm all like, yeah no kidding! πŸ™„ The fact that officials think reservoir levels aren't a big deal when it comes to wildfires just seems kinda obvious, right? I mean, we know that dry grasses and vegetation can ignite fires easily. But at the same time, having full reservoirs is always better than not, you know? Like if we do get super dry conditions, we've got some extra water to pull from.

And it's actually pretty cool (or should I say concerning?) that weather forecasts are playing a big role in all this. If national weather service predictions say there's gonna be back-to-back storms hitting the state, that's definitely worth keeping an eye on. Northern Cali's looking like they'll get some more rain, which is great for fire prevention, while Southern Cali is looking at some hot temps and less rainfall. So yeah, wildfire risk is still a thing, but it sounds like things might be looking up soon! β›ˆοΈ
 
Back
Top