The push to abolish Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has gained momentum in recent days, with more Americans than ever before supporting the measure. The demand for its abolition has been on the rise since January, when thousands of federal agents were deployed to Minneapolis by the Trump administration to crack down on a Somali population deemed "involuntary guest workers." Since then, the city has been under siege as protesters have taken to the streets and called for an end to ICE's operations.
The Democratic establishment, however, seems reluctant to take up the mantle. Despite the widespread outrage over ICE's actions in Minneapolis, top Democrats like Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) and Rep. Darren Soto (D-Fla.) have distanced themselves from the idea of abolishing the agency. Instead, they are pushing for incremental reforms that would only marginally address the problems with ICE.
The polls show a stark contrast between this approach and the views of the American public. A recent survey conducted by The Economist/YouGov found that 46 percent of respondents supported abolishing ICE, while only 43 percent opposed it. The shift is significant, as in July last year, only 27 percent of respondents supported abolishing ICE.
This growth in support for abolishing ICE could be the result of increased awareness about the agency's actions in Minneapolis and other cities across the country. However, Democrats seem to be playing catch-up, rather than taking the lead in addressing this growing issue.
The real problem with the incremental approach pushed by establishment Democrats is that it fails to address the fundamental issues with ICE. The agency has a long history of operating as a violent, lawless force that has targeted communities of color and immigrant populations without regard for due process or human rights. Abolishing ICE would be a crucial step in dismantling this system and creating a more just and equitable immigration policy.
While it may not happen overnight, Democrats should take note of the changing tides on this issue. To regain the trust of the American public and to address the growing demand for action, they should consider taking bold steps towards abolishing ICE. This could be the moderate position that could ultimately lead to their victory in the next election.
As The Intercept notes, setting oneself apart from Democrats like Kamala Harris by being bold can actually be a path to winning back power. By taking a clear stance on abolishing ICE and working towards dismantling the agency, Democrats would demonstrate their commitment to defending democracy and upholding human rights. It's time for them to take action rather than playing catch-up with the growing public sentiment against ICE.
The Democratic establishment, however, seems reluctant to take up the mantle. Despite the widespread outrage over ICE's actions in Minneapolis, top Democrats like Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) and Rep. Darren Soto (D-Fla.) have distanced themselves from the idea of abolishing the agency. Instead, they are pushing for incremental reforms that would only marginally address the problems with ICE.
The polls show a stark contrast between this approach and the views of the American public. A recent survey conducted by The Economist/YouGov found that 46 percent of respondents supported abolishing ICE, while only 43 percent opposed it. The shift is significant, as in July last year, only 27 percent of respondents supported abolishing ICE.
This growth in support for abolishing ICE could be the result of increased awareness about the agency's actions in Minneapolis and other cities across the country. However, Democrats seem to be playing catch-up, rather than taking the lead in addressing this growing issue.
The real problem with the incremental approach pushed by establishment Democrats is that it fails to address the fundamental issues with ICE. The agency has a long history of operating as a violent, lawless force that has targeted communities of color and immigrant populations without regard for due process or human rights. Abolishing ICE would be a crucial step in dismantling this system and creating a more just and equitable immigration policy.
While it may not happen overnight, Democrats should take note of the changing tides on this issue. To regain the trust of the American public and to address the growing demand for action, they should consider taking bold steps towards abolishing ICE. This could be the moderate position that could ultimately lead to their victory in the next election.
As The Intercept notes, setting oneself apart from Democrats like Kamala Harris by being bold can actually be a path to winning back power. By taking a clear stance on abolishing ICE and working towards dismantling the agency, Democrats would demonstrate their commitment to defending democracy and upholding human rights. It's time for them to take action rather than playing catch-up with the growing public sentiment against ICE.