Saudi Arabia's delaying tactics in its efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are causing collateral damage, with the country already feeling the impacts of climate change. The average temperature rose by 2.2C between 1979 and 2019, almost three times faster than the global rate, and even faster in Riyadh and Mecca. Sea levels are inexorably rising, threatening coastal oil terminals operated by Aramco, which use fossil fuels to transport 98% of the country's oil exports.
The kingdom's enormous wealth means it has options not available to poorer nations, such as air conditioning and desalination of seawater. However, if these continue to be powered by fossil fuels, they create a vicious circle that amplifies pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.
Saudi Arabia's national climate action is judged as "critically insufficient" by Climate Action Tracker, or at best "at the drawing board stage." The country's efforts to delay its transition from a petrostate are causing death and destruction across the planet. Delaying a fossil fuel phaseout only spells more death and destruction.
Deliberate delay inside the UN climate talks is as bad as continuing to pump emissions into the atmosphere. Doing both – as Saudi Arabia does – is even worse. The country's obstructionism in the UN climate talks should be taken into account when deciding who pays the money needed to help poorer countries recover from climate catastrophes.
The problem with Saudi Arabia's delaying tactics is that they are causing collateral damage, and it will take concerted efforts by the international community to change this. Experts led by Depledge have suggested implementing voting based on a supermajority of seven-eighths of nations, which would capture overwhelming support across the globe while sidelining a tiny minority of obstructors.
One way to speed up the negotiations is to sanction repeat procedural blockers, "just as delaying tactics in football can see offenders receive a yellow card." This would help to create a culture of accountability and ensure that countries are held to account for their actions in the UN climate talks.
The kingdom's enormous wealth means it has options not available to poorer nations, such as air conditioning and desalination of seawater. However, if these continue to be powered by fossil fuels, they create a vicious circle that amplifies pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.
Saudi Arabia's national climate action is judged as "critically insufficient" by Climate Action Tracker, or at best "at the drawing board stage." The country's efforts to delay its transition from a petrostate are causing death and destruction across the planet. Delaying a fossil fuel phaseout only spells more death and destruction.
Deliberate delay inside the UN climate talks is as bad as continuing to pump emissions into the atmosphere. Doing both – as Saudi Arabia does – is even worse. The country's obstructionism in the UN climate talks should be taken into account when deciding who pays the money needed to help poorer countries recover from climate catastrophes.
The problem with Saudi Arabia's delaying tactics is that they are causing collateral damage, and it will take concerted efforts by the international community to change this. Experts led by Depledge have suggested implementing voting based on a supermajority of seven-eighths of nations, which would capture overwhelming support across the globe while sidelining a tiny minority of obstructors.
One way to speed up the negotiations is to sanction repeat procedural blockers, "just as delaying tactics in football can see offenders receive a yellow card." This would help to create a culture of accountability and ensure that countries are held to account for their actions in the UN climate talks.