What the Cubs' signings say about their approach to building the 2026 bullpen

The Chicago Cubs are taking a more measured approach to constructing their 2026 bullpen, signing veterans and relying on depth rather than committing big bucks to top relievers.

According to manager Craig Counsell, the team underestimated its bullpen's performance last season, but ultimately discovered it had several effective arms that could step up when needed. The key takeaway from this experience is getting a mix of good pitchers and being prepared to make adjustments during the season.

So far, the Cubs have signed Phil Maton to a two-year deal and agreed on a one-year contract with Hoby Milner. These moves indicate a shift away from the team's traditional "volume approach," which has historically involved taking smaller deals on pitchers with the hopes of finding hidden gems.

Maton's signing was notable because it marked the first time since Craig Kimbrel in 2019 that a reliever signed a multi-year deal with the Cubs. President of baseball operations Jed Hoyer acknowledged that the market for such deals moved quickly, but he prefers to stick to his team's traditional approach, which relies on smaller commitments and a reliance on pitching infrastructure.

The Cubs are still in the process of filling out their bullpen, with several spots remaining to be filled through major league signings, young players in the system, and minor league deals. However, Hoyer believes that this approach will provide more stability and allow the team to "take some randomness out of the game" by having a stronger defense.

The addition of Milner, another soft-throwing finesse pitcher with a high ground-ball rate, could also play to the Cubs' strength in their defense. While his signing doesn't fully embody the volume approach, it does contain elements, including a low-risk financial investment and potential for a breakout or bounce-back year.

Overall, the Cubs are taking a more cautious approach to building their bullpen, prioritizing depth over big-name signings. This strategy may provide more stability in the long run, but it also means that the team will have to be patient and willing to adapt as the season unfolds.
 
I'm not sure if I agree with the Cubs' new approach ๐Ÿค”. They had some great relief pitchers last season and I think they could've gotten more from their bullpen if they spent a bit more on top-tier arms. Maton's signing is cool, but it's just one guy... what about guys like Ryan Tepera or Craig Stammen? Those guys are proven performers and would make a big difference in the middle of the bullpen ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. Plus, I think the Cubs are going to get burned if they're not willing to spend on top relievers when the market dictates it. We'll just have to see how this approach plays out over time ๐Ÿ’ก
 
I don't know man... ๐Ÿค” I was watching some old Cubs games from 2016 when they had this crazy bullpen with Rizzo pitching in relief lol. It was wild! But seriously, I remember how that team had so much success, and now it seems like they're trying to replicate that without spending all the money on one guy. Phil Maton signing is cool, but I miss the old days when they could get a big-name reliever like Kimbrel for 1 year. The Cubs are just taking a different path this time around... ๐Ÿ˜
 
๐Ÿค” They're finally coming around to getting some actual depth in the bullpen. It's about time, tbh ๐Ÿ™„. Last season was a huge letdown with all those relievers underperforming. I mean, who needs top-tier closers when you've got a bunch of guys who can just kinda...get it done? ๐Ÿ˜ The Cubs are trying to buck the trend of overspending on one guy and instead focusing on a solid squad of mid-tier pitchers. It's about time they prioritized stability over flash ๐Ÿ™ƒ
 
I think this is a super smart move by the Cubs! They learned a harsh lesson last season about not relying too much on their bullpen, so now they're being more cautious and trying to build depth instead of breaking the bank on top relievers ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿšจ. I mean, it's always better to have a solid foundation than to chase after a few flashy signings that might not pan out ๐Ÿค”. Phil Maton and Hoby Milner are great additions to their team - they'll definitely bring some stability to that bullpen! ๐Ÿ‘
 
I think this is like, super interesting ๐Ÿค”. So the Cubs are taking a more measured approach to building their bullpen, which I guess you could say is similar to how politicians always talk about being fiscally responsible ๐Ÿค‘. They're not throwing around big bucks on top relievers and instead opting for a mix of good pitchers and depth. It's like, they're playing the long game here.

But at the same time, it makes me wonder if this approach is just another example of the Cubs' "incremental change" strategy ๐Ÿ“ˆ. They're not making any drastic moves to shake things up, but instead trying to tweak their system to get better results. It's like, are they too afraid to take risks and make a big splash? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

And what about the fans? Are we getting the team we want, or are we just getting a watered-down version of it? I mean, if the Cubs can't even commit to signing top relievers, how can they be expected to bring in a championship? It's like, where is the leadership here? ๐Ÿค”
 
๐Ÿค” I'm kinda surprised they're shifting away from that volume approach. It's all about finding those hidden gems, right? ๐Ÿคž Now it feels like they're playing it safe, which might not be as exciting for fans who love seeing big-name signings... ๐Ÿ˜ But hey, if it means more stability and a stronger defense down the line, I'm all for it! ๐Ÿ’ช
 
I think this is a solid move by the Cubs ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ’ก. Signing veteran pitchers like Maton and Milner shows they're not gonna break the bank on top relievers ๐Ÿ’ธ. It's all about finding that mix of good arms and being prepared to make adjustments during the season โšพ๏ธ. I mean, last season was a wake-up call for them, they figured out what worked and are making smart moves now ๐Ÿ“Š. The defense is definitely key in this game, and having pitchers like Milner who can induce ground balls ๐ŸŒŽ will only help that aspect of their game. Of course, it's not gonna be the most exciting way to build a bullpen, but if it leads to more stability and wins โšพ๏ธ... I'm all for it! ๐Ÿ‘
 
I'm not sure I agree with the Cubs' new "measured approach" ๐Ÿค”. They're essentially saying that having a bunch of good pitchers is more important than having one superstar closer. But what about when you need someone to step up in a high-pressure situation? Like, what if they have to face the Yankees in the playoffs and Phil Maton can't get the job done ๐Ÿ’ช?

And don't even get me started on how this affects the farm system ๐ŸŒพ. If they're not investing in top relievers, are they going to let all those young players develop into actual pros or just stick them in the minors? I think it's time for teams like the Cubs to rethink their approach and start taking some more risks ๐Ÿ”ฅ.

I do love the addition of Hoby Milner though ๐ŸŽ‰. He seems like a solid addition to the bullpen, but we'll have to wait and see if he can live up to his potential ๐Ÿ’ซ.
 
๐Ÿ“Š The data's looking good for the Cubs' new bullpen approach ๐Ÿค”. I mean, think about it... last season they went from underestimating their bullpen to finding effective arms, right? That tells me they're onto something ๐Ÿ’ก. Signing Maton and Milner is a great move - it's not just about getting big-name relievers, but about building that pitching infrastructure ๐Ÿ“ˆ. And let's be real, a stronger defense can make all the difference in terms of stability โšพ๏ธ.

Here are some stats to back this up:

* The Cubs' bullpen had an ERA of 3.64 last season - not bad at all! ๐Ÿ’ฏ
* In contrast, teams that prioritize top relievers often see their bullpens take a step back after the initial signing ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ.
* Maton's signing is a great example of this - he's a low-risk, high-reward move ๐Ÿค‘. And Milner's ground-ball rate is already up to 55% this season, which is no joke! ๐Ÿ˜ฒ

It's all about being patient and adaptable, folks. The Cubs may not be the flashiest team on paper, but they're building something solid ๐Ÿ”’.
 
I'm not sure how I feel about the Cubs' new approach to building their bullpen ๐Ÿค”. On one hand, prioritizing depth over big-name signings is definitely a smart move - you never know what's going to happen with pitchers during the season and it's great that they're taking a more measured approach ๐Ÿ’ก.

On the other hand, I'm worried that this might lead to them missing out on some big-name relievers who could make a real impact ๐Ÿšจ. Phil Maton is a solid signing, but if they don't take any bigger risks, they'll be left playing catch-up in the postseason โฐ.

I also think it's interesting that Hoyer is going against his own traditional approach to pitching infrastructure ๐Ÿคฏ. It will be fun to see how this all plays out and whether it pays off for the Cubs in the long run ๐Ÿ‘€.
 
Ugh, can't believe they're skipping the big bucks for top relievers anymore ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. I mean, I get where they're coming from, wanting stability in the bullpen, but it feels like they're just settling for mediocrity ๐Ÿค”. Phil Maton and Hoby Milner are great signings don't get me wrong, but I still want to see some A-list talent on that team ๐Ÿ’ช. It's like they're trying to be the Cubs' version of the Royals instead of going all out and competing with the best ๐Ÿ†. The lack of a "volume approach" is kinda boring, in my opinion ๐Ÿ˜ด. Can't wait to see how this whole thing plays out!
 
I'm not convinced this is the best way to go about it ๐Ÿค”. I mean, they're not committing to these guys like they used to, just signing 'em for a few years and hoping they pan out. It's like playing a game of musical chairs, where someone's always gonna get benched or injured and you'll be stuck with no one in the bullpen.

I think it's better to go all in on a guy you know you can count on, rather than spreading yourself too thin trying to find that perfect mix of veterans and young guys. And what's with this "taking randomness out of the game" business? I don't see how signing more guys is gonna make the game less unpredictable ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ.

And have they considered the impact on the fans? It's like they're losing some of that excitement and drama when you're not trying to find that next big thing. Give me a team that goes all out for it, you know? This measured approach just doesn't feel right to me ๐Ÿ˜
 
๐Ÿค” I'm just gonna say it... signing guys like Phil Maton and Hoby Milner on multi-year deals is a bit weird for me. Back in my day, we used to try to find those diamond-in-the-rough pitchers who could step up when needed, you know? Not committing big bucks to top relievers was the way to go. I get it, things have changed and the market's moved on... but there's something about this "volume approach" that just doesn't feel right to me ๐Ÿ˜.

I mean, I love stability as much as the next guy, but sometimes you gotta roll the dice a bit if you wanna make a deep run in the playoffs. This cautious approach might give 'em an edge in the long run, but it's also gonna be tough to compete with teams that are willing to take some risks and spend big on their bullpens ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. Still, I guess only time'll tell if this strategy pays off for the Cubs...
 
I gotta say, I'm loving the Cubs' new approach to building their bullpen ๐Ÿคฉ. They're ditching the high-risk, high-reward strategy and opting for a more measured approach instead. Signing Phil Maton and Hoby Milner is all about creating stability and depth, which can only be a good thing for the team. I mean, it's always exciting to see new players join the roster, but sometimes you gotta prioritize function over flash ๐Ÿ”ฎ. And let's be real, who doesn't love having a solid bullpen that can step up when needed? It's all about being prepared and making adjustments along the way ๐Ÿ”„. I'm curious to see how this strategy pays off for them in 2026 โšพ๏ธ.
 
I love how the Cubs are shifting their strategy to focus on depth instead of just throwing big bucks at top relievers ๐Ÿ’ช๐ŸŒŸ. It's all about finding that mix of good pitchers and being prepared for adjustments, right? ๐Ÿค” I'm super excited to see Phil Maton and Hoby Milner bring in some fresh talent! The defense is definitely a strength for the team, so it makes sense they're investing in guys who complement that ๐Ÿ‘. Can't wait to see how this new approach plays out in the 2026 season ๐ŸŽ‰
 
So I think its cool how the Cubs r takin a more measured approach 2 buildin their bullpen ๐Ÿค”...like they learned from last season & realized depth is key! Signing Phil Maton 2 a 2-year deal & Hoby Milner 2 a 1-year contract shows they wanna prioritize stability over makin big splashes. I mean, its not the most exciting thing 2 do, but if it means havin a more solid foundation in the long run, idc ๐Ÿ’ฏ...it's all about bein patient & adaptin 2 what unfolds during the season ๐Ÿ“ˆ
 
ugh i dont get why theyre not just going all in on some elite closers lol 2 yrs on phil maton is pretty weak tbh the cubs are basically just paying guys to throw strikes rather than actually being a game-changer ๐Ÿค” also whats up with hobey milner? guy's got skills but not sure he's worth that kinda cash... and dont even get me started on craig kimbrel's deal in 2019... i mean who thought it was a good idea to commit big bucks to a closer like that? ๐Ÿค‘
 
Back
Top