The Trump administration's sweeping definition of "domestic terrorism" - which encompasses a wide range of activities that would previously be considered constitutionally protected speech or political activism - is a thinly veiled attempt to justify the extrajudicial killings of civilians at sea and on land. The administration's National Security Presidential Memorandum 7, or NSPM-7, conflates anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, anti-Christianity, anti-fascism, and radical gender ideologies with "domestic terrorism," a term that has no basis in US law.
This new definition of domestic terrorism is not only a gross overreach of executive power but also has the potential to silence dissenting voices across the country. The administration's rhetoric about "domestic terror" bears striking resemblance to McCarthyism, where anyone deemed an enemy of the state was accused and punished without due process or trial.
In Minneapolis, federal agents killed two civilians, Renee Good and Alex Pretti, who were simply filming their activities as a form of free speech. The administration's decision to label them as "domestic terrorists" and justify their killings is a stark reminder that in the eyes of the Trump administration, dissenting voices are the enemy.
The administration's use of this definition of domestic terrorism raises serious concerns about its intentions to suppress opposition and silence critics. If allowed to stand, NSPM-7 would create a chilling effect on free speech and civil liberties across the country.
Experts argue that the definition of domestic terrorism in NSPM-7 is too broad and could be used to justify extrajudicial killings. The administration's use of this term to describe its opponents is a thinly veiled attempt to label them as terrorists, thereby justifying their suppression through any means necessary.
The Trump administration's assault on democracy has been well-documented, with the erosion of civil liberties, attacks on the free press, and attempts to undermine the rule of law. The latest definition of domestic terrorism is another example of this broader agenda to consolidate power and silence dissenting voices.
This new definition of domestic terrorism is not only a gross overreach of executive power but also has the potential to silence dissenting voices across the country. The administration's rhetoric about "domestic terror" bears striking resemblance to McCarthyism, where anyone deemed an enemy of the state was accused and punished without due process or trial.
In Minneapolis, federal agents killed two civilians, Renee Good and Alex Pretti, who were simply filming their activities as a form of free speech. The administration's decision to label them as "domestic terrorists" and justify their killings is a stark reminder that in the eyes of the Trump administration, dissenting voices are the enemy.
The administration's use of this definition of domestic terrorism raises serious concerns about its intentions to suppress opposition and silence critics. If allowed to stand, NSPM-7 would create a chilling effect on free speech and civil liberties across the country.
Experts argue that the definition of domestic terrorism in NSPM-7 is too broad and could be used to justify extrajudicial killings. The administration's use of this term to describe its opponents is a thinly veiled attempt to label them as terrorists, thereby justifying their suppression through any means necessary.
The Trump administration's assault on democracy has been well-documented, with the erosion of civil liberties, attacks on the free press, and attempts to undermine the rule of law. The latest definition of domestic terrorism is another example of this broader agenda to consolidate power and silence dissenting voices.
. i mean, whats next? silencing ppl who wear hoodies or listen to certain music? the trump admin is straight up scary rn 
I was just thinking about my favorite coffee shop near my place 
and how much I love their seasonal latte flavors 
. Have you guys tried that new matcha flavor they have? It's amazing! Anyway, back to the news... this definition of domestic terrorism thingy sounds super concerning 
. I mean, who gets labeled as a terrorist just for disagreeing with someone? That's like, so not how it works in a free society 
. I'm all for critical thinking and debate, but come on! Don't we need to talk about our differences instead of throwing labels around? 
IT'S LIKE THEY'RE TRYING TO TAKE AWAY OUR RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH!!! 
THE FACT THAT THEY CAN JUST LABEL ANYONE THEY DON'T AGREE WITH AS A "DOMESTIC TERRORIST" IS UNACCEPTABLE!!! 
IT'S LIKE THEY THINK THEY CAN JUST WALK ALL OVER US AND GET AWAY WITH IT!!! 
I MEAN, WHAT ABOUT FREE PRESS?!?! WHAT ABOUT THE RIGHT TO ASSEMBLE AND SPEAK OUT AGAINST INJUSTICE?!?! THIS Definition of domestic terrorism is a JOKE!!! 
A WAY FOR THEM TO JUSTIFY KILLING PEOPLE LIKE RENEÉ GOOD AND ALEX PRETTI FOR DOING NOTHING BUT FILMING THEIR ACTIVITIES!!! 
IT'S WRONG ON SO MANY LEVELS!!!
. I'm so worried about what this means for our country and our way of life 
. Can't they see that dissenting voices are supposed to be protected, not silenced? It's like they're trying to create a dystopian nightmare or something 
.
, which is just plain paranoid. i mean, what's next? labeling all the protesters at the president's speeches as domestic terrorists and letting federal agents go after them w/ guns drawn? 
... it feels like they're tryin to silence dissenting voices and stifle free speech, which is a total overreach of power 
.
This whole thing is getting super concerning 
where the government is trying to silence anyone who dares to question them 
.
. We need to stand up against this and fight for our rights to free speech and assembly 
. We need to push back on this and make sure our voices are heard 
!
. The fact that the Trump admin has gone after civilians with cameras just to get ahead of a lawsuit says it all - they're more interested in silencing us than actually addressing the issues 
... I mean, they're trying to label anyone who's anti-establishment or questions the status quo as a "domestic terrorist" ... it's like something out of a movie 
... but you know what? I think there's more to it than that. Like, have you seen all the protests and riots happening across the country lately? It seems like they're just trying to distract us from their real agenda 
... I'm not saying it's about silencing dissenting voices or anything, but... have you noticed how many of these "domestic terrorists" just happen to be at events where people are protesting against the administration's policies? 
. I mean, what's next? Labeling people who want better healthcare or education as terrorists? 
it's just not right and it's definitely a slippery slope for our civil liberties 
.
. I mean, what's to stop us from becoming a country where we can just label someone a terrorist and then... well, you know 
.
I'm getting so tired of politicians using vague terms like "domestic terrorism" to justify their actions. It's like they think we're all just going to sit back and be quiet if they label us as terrorists 
. This definition is a slap in the face to free speech and civil liberties everywhere. Can't our leaders just have an honest conversation without resorting to intimidation tactics?