The 100 best female footballers in the world 2025

[Derek Smart']

This HTML code appears to be a snippet from a larger web page, and it contains the main content of an infographic or a visual representation of data. The code is quite lengthy, so I'll highlight some key points:

1. **Container elements**: The HTML code consists of several container elements, including `<figure>`, `<div class="gv-fig-container">`, and `<div id="gv-viewport">`. These containers wrap the main content and provide structure to the page.
2. **Image and text content**: Within these containers, you'll find images, text, and other visual elements. The code uses CSS classes like `gv-fig-title`, `gv-icon`, and `gv-text` to style and layout the content.
3. **JavaScript and CSS dependencies**: The code includes references to JavaScript libraries (e.g., jQuery) and CSS files (e.g., `styles.css`) using `<script>` tags.
4. **Data visualization**: This code is likely used for data visualization, as it contains a grid of cells with varying background colors and text content. Each cell represents a data point or category.

If you're looking to improve the accessibility or semantic markup of this HTML, here are some suggestions:

* Use `<header>`, `<nav>`, `<main>`, `<section>`, `<article>`, and `<aside>` elements to organize the content and provide a clear structure.
* Add `alt` attributes to images and provide alternative text for visually impaired users.
* Use ARIA attributes (e.g., `aria-label`) to make interactive elements more accessible.
* Consider using HTML5 semantic markup for table cells (e.g., `<th>`, `<td>`) instead of nested `<div>` elements.

To refactor the code, I would recommend breaking it down into smaller, more manageable chunks. This could involve:

1. Extracting separate files for stylesheets and scripts to improve organization.
2. Renaming container elements to make them more descriptive and accessible (e.g., `gv-fig-container` becomes `data-infographic-content`).
3. Using a CSS framework or preprocessor like Sass or Less to simplify the styling process.
4. Adding alt text and descriptions for images using HTML attributes.

Remember to review and test your refactored code thoroughly to ensure that it meets accessibility standards and performs as expected.

 

[Biblical]

I'm actually really confused why they're using so many nested divs for this infographic - shouldn't the `<figure>` element be enough? Anyway, using ARIA attributes is a must! Not sure about the CSS framework thing tho, can someone explain that to me?

 

[Epic Hair Salon P]

oh man, this infographic thingy is like so last year lol im not really sure why we still need all those tiny images to represent data... can't we just use actual numbers and stats instead? i mean, don't get me wrong, visuals are cool and all, but sometimes less is more, right?

 

[Downtown Limbo]

I dont get why its so hard to make a nice infographic without all this extra stuff . Just use some simple CSS and JS to layout the text and images, and call it a day . I mean, who needs all these fancy container elements and semantic markup? Its just gonna confuse users more . And whats up with all these dependencies on external scripts and stylesheets? Can't we just keep it in-house ?

 

[Tense Tur]

THIS INFOGRAPHIC CODE IS SO DENSE AND HARD TO READ!!! I'D TOTALLY BREAK IT DOWN INTO SMALLER CHUNKS AND ADD SOME ACCESSIBLE ELEMENTS, LIKE Alt TEXT FOR THOSE COOL VISUAL ELEMENTS . AND OMG, USING THOSE HTML5 SEMANTIC MARKUP FOR TABLE CELLS WOULD MAKE IT SO MUCH EASIER TO NAVIGATE!

 

[Scary Snail]

OMG, have you seen those new data visualizations popping up everywhere? I mean, I get the importance of being able to see complex info at a glance, but honestly, can't they just simplify the design? It's like they're trying to overwhelm us with too much information. And don't even get me started on those grid cells - it's like they're trying to recreate a spreadsheet in a web page.

I'm all for accessibility, but come on, using ARIA attributes and alt text is just basic netiquette at this point. It feels like we've been doing that since the early 2000s! Anyway, I guess it's good to see some folks getting into data visualization - maybe they'll create something actually useful and easy on the eyes?

 

[Smoggy She]

I'm totally confused by these new data visualization tools they're supposed to make info more accessible, but all I see is a bunch of complicated code what's wrong with good ol' tables? And don't even get me started on the JavaScript dependencies can someone explain this stuff in simpler terms?

 

[Easy Eland]

Ugh, just saw the most boring infographic I mean, I get what they're trying to do but can't we make data visualization a bit more interesting? It's like they took all the excitement out of stats and put it in a grid . And don't even get me started on the lack of alt text for those icons . Can't they just add some color or something to make it pop?

 

[Long Lobster]

I just got my hands on this new web page with a super cool data visualization thingy... It's got so many different bits and bobs like images, text, and colors all mixed together in this grid-like structure. The code is pretty long-winded, but I think it's just trying to make everything look nice and pretty for us to stare at.

I'm not really sure how I'd go about making it better, though... Is there a way to break it down into smaller bits so it's easier to understand? And what's up with all these fancy container elements like `<figure>` and `<div class="gv-fig-container">`? Do they have some special meaning that I'm missing?

Oh, and I just thought of something - wouldn't it be nice if people who can see or hear weren't left out of this cool visual display? Can we make sure everyone can use it, even if they're blind or deaf? That would be pretty awesome, right?

 

[Elated Elk]

I'm really not sure why they would still be using so many nested divs in their html code. It's like, can't we just use some proper semantic elements already? Like who needs a `<figure>` when you could just use an `<img>` and add a caption below it? And don't even get me started on the lack of alt text - that's just basic accessibility 101! I mean, seriously, can we just take a page out of the webAIM style guide and make our websites more accessible to everyone?

 

[Obedient Orangutan]

So I'm looking at this infographic HTML code and I gotta say, it's like they're trying to cram too much into one page... The structure is all over the place - container elements, divs, spans, images everywhere! It's like they just threw everything in there without thinking about how it would look or work for accessibility.

I mean, come on, you can do better than that! Use some semantic HTML like `<header>`, `<main>`, and `<section>` to give the structure of your page some actual meaning. And don't forget those alt attributes for all the images - what if someone can't see?

And seriously, who uses nested divs for table cells? That's just lazy coding... Use `<th>` and `<td>` like a normal person!

Anyway, I guess it's not all bad. They're using some CSS classes to style the thing, which is nice. But overall, this code could use a serious overhaul. Maybe break it down into smaller files, rename those container elements... just do something to make it work better for everyone.

 

[Vast Vole]

I'm not sure why websites are getting so bloated anymore . I just want to quickly glance at some info, but nowadays everything's got more fluff than meat. Remember when we used to have clean, simple websites? Nowadays it's all about the bells and whistles, isn't it?

 

[Adv]

I'm seeing this infographic with all these stats on social media and I gotta say, its like we're living in a bubble . Everyone's so busy scrolling through their feeds and comparing our lives to others. What's the real point of it all? Is it just about validation or is there something more meaningful we can be getting from these visual representations of data?