A staggering $2.2 trillion a year: Synthetic chemicals wreak havoc on global health and economy.
Researchers have sounded the alarm that synthetic chemicals are having a devastating impact on human health and the environment. According to a new report, exposure to these chemicals can lead to increased rates of cancer, neurodevelopmental conditions, and infertility. The economic burden of this problem is estimated to be as high as $2.2 trillion annually - roughly equivalent to the profits of the world's 100 largest publicly listed companies.
The four synthetic chemicals in question - phthalates, bisphenols, pesticides, and PFAS (or "forever chemicals") - are ubiquitous in our food system. Phthalates and bisphenols are used as plastic additives, while pesticides underpin industrial agriculture, allowing for large-scale monoculture farms to spray thousands of gallons on crops to eliminate weeds and insects. PFAS, meanwhile, have accumulated in the environment to such an extent that they enter food via air, soil, and water contamination.
The consequences of these chemicals are far-reaching. Exposure to endocrine disruptors like bisphenols and phthalates has been linked to harms including cancer, birth defects, intellectual impairment, and obesity. In fact, researchers warn that if exposure persists at current rates, there could be between 200 million and 700 million fewer births between 2025 and 2100.
Philip Landrigan, a leading expert on the topic, describes the report as a "wake-up call." He argues that the problem of chemical pollution is just as serious as climate change and urges governments to take action. However, he notes that there are few safeguards in place to test for the safety of industrial chemicals before they're put into use, and little monitoring of their effects once they're introduced.
The report's findings have significant implications for global agriculture and food production. It highlights the need for more stringent regulations and monitoring of synthetic chemical use, as well as a shift towards safer, more sustainable practices.
As Landrigan ominously notes, there are thousands of chemicals to which we're all exposed every day about which we know nothing. Until one of them causes something obvious, like children born with missing limbs, we'll continue to go mindlessly exposing ourselves. It's time for policymakers and industry leaders to take action - the future of our health and economy depends on it.
Researchers have sounded the alarm that synthetic chemicals are having a devastating impact on human health and the environment. According to a new report, exposure to these chemicals can lead to increased rates of cancer, neurodevelopmental conditions, and infertility. The economic burden of this problem is estimated to be as high as $2.2 trillion annually - roughly equivalent to the profits of the world's 100 largest publicly listed companies.
The four synthetic chemicals in question - phthalates, bisphenols, pesticides, and PFAS (or "forever chemicals") - are ubiquitous in our food system. Phthalates and bisphenols are used as plastic additives, while pesticides underpin industrial agriculture, allowing for large-scale monoculture farms to spray thousands of gallons on crops to eliminate weeds and insects. PFAS, meanwhile, have accumulated in the environment to such an extent that they enter food via air, soil, and water contamination.
The consequences of these chemicals are far-reaching. Exposure to endocrine disruptors like bisphenols and phthalates has been linked to harms including cancer, birth defects, intellectual impairment, and obesity. In fact, researchers warn that if exposure persists at current rates, there could be between 200 million and 700 million fewer births between 2025 and 2100.
Philip Landrigan, a leading expert on the topic, describes the report as a "wake-up call." He argues that the problem of chemical pollution is just as serious as climate change and urges governments to take action. However, he notes that there are few safeguards in place to test for the safety of industrial chemicals before they're put into use, and little monitoring of their effects once they're introduced.
The report's findings have significant implications for global agriculture and food production. It highlights the need for more stringent regulations and monitoring of synthetic chemical use, as well as a shift towards safer, more sustainable practices.
As Landrigan ominously notes, there are thousands of chemicals to which we're all exposed every day about which we know nothing. Until one of them causes something obvious, like children born with missing limbs, we'll continue to go mindlessly exposing ourselves. It's time for policymakers and industry leaders to take action - the future of our health and economy depends on it.
we're talking millions of fewer births over the next century if we don't take action... that's a whole different kind of climate disaster 
. It's crazy to think that exposure to these chemicals can lead to cancer, neurodevelopmental conditions, and infertility! The fact that we're talking about a global health crisis is a wake-up call 
. We need stricter regulations and monitoring of synthetic chemical use ASAP 
. We can't just sit back and wait for something obvious to happen – we need policymakers and industry leaders to take action now 
.
. We need to shift towards safer, more sustainable practices that prioritize human health over profits 
. This isn't just about us as individuals, it's about creating a better future for generations to come 
.
.
I mean, we're talking cancer, birth defects, and infertility here... that's some serious stuff 
. And it's not just the health issues, the economic burden is huge too 
.
. It's like we're constantly being poisoned and nobody's really paying attention. 
I know there are experts warning us about this for years now, but it still feels like a wake-up call is long overdue 
.
It seems like we're all in this together and we need to start making some changes. 
.
. Who's going to hold these companies responsible for their actions? And what exactly does "safeguards in place" even mean? It sounds like a bunch of feel-good jargon to me 
. Time to wake up, policymakers, and start making some real changes 
!
But now I realize how widespread they are 
We need to take action ASAP 
. I mean, what kind of system allows chemicals that are literally making us sick and harming the environment to be used in such massive quantities? We need stricter regulations ASAP 
and some serious safety measures put in place before it's too late 
. And Landrigan is right, this is just as bad as climate change - we can't keep ignoring these issues. I'm so worried about the future of our kids and the state of the planet 
Those "forever chemicals" are literally forever, and it's like, how do we even begin to clean up that mess? 
we need to take action ASAP and make some serious changes in our food system and industries 
. I mean, phthalates and bisphenols in our plastics? PFAS everywhere? It's like we're trying to poison ourselves on purpose 
.
. We need to take action ASAP, but it's hard to see how governments are gonna make a difference when there aren't even safeguards in place for testing these chemicals 
.
. It's time to wake up and take control of our own health and future 
. I'm all for safer regulations and more sustainable practices, but come on, it's about time we took a hard look at the damage we've done to ourselves and the planet 
.
? Is he just a paid shill or does he actually have some hard evidence to back up his claims? I need more info before I start jumping on the bandwagon 
.
! I'm like 200 million fewer births? That's a lot 
. Industry leaders and policymakers gotta step up their game 
. Time to make some changes! 
we need some serious leadership on this one... politicians & industry leaders gotta step up their game 
like 200 million to 700 million fewer births between 2025 and 2100 is just heartbreaking. my mum had fertility issues with her first child and i can only imagine how hard it must be for people trying to conceive now 
i'm all for stricter regulations and safer practices but what's the point of knowing if no one's gonna take action? 
. i mean, who isn't aware of the toxic chemical situation we're in? but seriously, $2.2 trillion is just crazy 
. but nope, we're too busy lining the pockets of corporations to care about the consequences. until someone gets hurt, i guess