Replacing Manager Midseason: A High-Stakes Decision with Few Simple Solutions
The football world is abuzz with the latest managerial merry-go-round. Liverpool and Tottenham, two of England's biggest clubs, have been struggling to find their footing on the pitch, prompting the question: when do you know it's time for a change at the top?
For both clubs, European competition has provided some respite from the domestic grind. Liverpool looked sharp in a 3-0 win over Marseille, while Spurs impressed in a 2-0 victory over Borussia Dortmund. However, this success is tempered by the harsh reality that most European sides simply can't compete with the physicality of the Premier League.
The situation at each club is different, but both face a common dilemma: what to do when it seems like their manager has run out of steam in midseason? Who replaces them, and how do they find someone who's both up to the task and currently available?
Complications abound, particularly with the World Cup looming. Many top managers will be released from their contracts after the tournament, but clubs can't afford to make deals before then without risking a backlash. And even when they can sign new talent, it's unlikely that a single person can instantly elevate a struggling team.
Promising young managers are often hesitant to jump ship in January or February, when the stakes are high and the risk of failure is substantial. They may be missing out on FA Cup or European opportunities, not to mention the reputational damage that comes with inheriting a troubled team.
The only option for clubs desperate to qualify for the Champions League or make a deep run in Europe is to turn to an interim manager – a former player who might just do too well and spark demands for his permanent appointment. This can create a toxic atmosphere, making it even harder for whoever is ultimately appointed.
One club has taken a different approach: Crystal Palace has stuck with Oliver Glasner, despite his apparent unhappiness with the team's direction. The gamble may pay off in the summer when he leaves, but for now, it's a case of sticking with the devil you know rather than taking a chance on someone new.
As the season wears on, both Liverpool and Tottenham face an uncertain future. It's hard to see Thomas Frank remaining at Spurs come next season, while Arne Slot may struggle to turn his team around before then. The question is: will anyone be able to right the ship, or will these clubs continue to struggle with their managerial decisions?
The football world is abuzz with the latest managerial merry-go-round. Liverpool and Tottenham, two of England's biggest clubs, have been struggling to find their footing on the pitch, prompting the question: when do you know it's time for a change at the top?
For both clubs, European competition has provided some respite from the domestic grind. Liverpool looked sharp in a 3-0 win over Marseille, while Spurs impressed in a 2-0 victory over Borussia Dortmund. However, this success is tempered by the harsh reality that most European sides simply can't compete with the physicality of the Premier League.
The situation at each club is different, but both face a common dilemma: what to do when it seems like their manager has run out of steam in midseason? Who replaces them, and how do they find someone who's both up to the task and currently available?
Complications abound, particularly with the World Cup looming. Many top managers will be released from their contracts after the tournament, but clubs can't afford to make deals before then without risking a backlash. And even when they can sign new talent, it's unlikely that a single person can instantly elevate a struggling team.
Promising young managers are often hesitant to jump ship in January or February, when the stakes are high and the risk of failure is substantial. They may be missing out on FA Cup or European opportunities, not to mention the reputational damage that comes with inheriting a troubled team.
The only option for clubs desperate to qualify for the Champions League or make a deep run in Europe is to turn to an interim manager – a former player who might just do too well and spark demands for his permanent appointment. This can create a toxic atmosphere, making it even harder for whoever is ultimately appointed.
One club has taken a different approach: Crystal Palace has stuck with Oliver Glasner, despite his apparent unhappiness with the team's direction. The gamble may pay off in the summer when he leaves, but for now, it's a case of sticking with the devil you know rather than taking a chance on someone new.
As the season wears on, both Liverpool and Tottenham face an uncertain future. It's hard to see Thomas Frank remaining at Spurs come next season, while Arne Slot may struggle to turn his team around before then. The question is: will anyone be able to right the ship, or will these clubs continue to struggle with their managerial decisions?
This whole midseason managerial shakeup thing is wild. People are so quick to blame the manager for everything but actually making a change can be super tricky 
. The fact that top managers can't even make deals before the World Cup just adds to it 
. What's your take on these clubs trying out interim managers? Do they ever really work out or is it just a quick fix?
. Both Liverpool and Tottenham are struggling so big time, and I don't blame them for wanting someone new at the helm.
️. But until then, its all about finding someone who's available and willing to take on the challenge 
. It's like, they're stuck between a rock and a hard place - do they risk losing their best players by signing someone new, or do they stick with what they know might not be working? 
. We need some transparency, you know? It's like, come on guys, we're all football fans here! Let us know who you're trying to sign or replace 
.
.
but replacing midseason is super tricky 
and isn't gonna mess up the squad 
anyway, crystal palace is sticking with their manager oliver glasner 
hope it pays off for them 
️
like Pep Guardiola did at City when he came in 
. Or maybe they should just stick with the current assistant coach or something idk 
This midseason managerial change talk is soooo stressful 
Like, I get it, teams need a boost and all that... but what's the real solution here? 
? 
.
For me, what matters most is if the team is winning or losing isn't as important as the way they do it. So many fans are obsessed with getting rid of their manager when things aren't going well but have you ever thought about whether its really the managers fault? Maybe they just need a bit more support from the board or the players. 
. what i wanna know is, wot's gonna happen in summer? if glasner leaves palace will we see new faces or just same old problems?
I feel like it's all about finding the right person who can lift them up midseason. It's not easy, right? Some clubs are gonna have to make some big moves before the World Cup 
And poor Thomas Frank at Spurs he's got a tough one on his hands 
maybe someone new will come in and save the day 
like they're trying to win a Nobel Prize 
and then there's the whole world cup thing... good luck findin someone who's available & not gonna hold up the team 
It's just so stressful watching these clubs try to turn their seasons around.
. dont know how they're gonna make it to the champions league or even qualify 4 europe 
.
And let's not forget about the whole FA Cup/European opportunities thing - a new manager might be hesitant to take on a struggling team and miss out on some decent cup runs.
Anyway, I think Crystal Palace is actually doing this "sticking with the devil you know" thing right. Maybe they'll get some stability and turn their season around 
. It's getting frustrating watching them struggle... 
