Pentagon puts 1,500 troops on standby in Alaska as Minnesota braces for possible deployment amidst escalating tensions over immigration crackdown.
The Pentagon has ordered approximately 1,500 active-duty soldiers stationed in Alaska to be placed on prepare-to-deploy orders, pending a potential deployment to Minnesota. The state has seen increasingly violent confrontations between residents and federal immigration officers since Renee Good's fatal shooting by an ICE agent last month.
President Donald Trump has threatened to deploy troops under the Insurrection Act if Democratic officials fail to quell protests against his administration's deportation drive. However, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey has dismissed this move as "ridiculous" and warned it would only exacerbate tensions in the city.
According to sources, the deployment of troops is seen as a contingency measure should violence escalate in Minnesota. The state's Hmong community, who are being targeted by ICE agents, have been subjected to raids and intimidation. In one incident, federal agents entered an elderly man's home in St Paul wearing only underwear and a blanket, prompting onlookers to shout for them to leave.
The deployment of troops has sparked fears that the Trump administration is seeking to intimidate local residents into compliance with its deportation policies. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has mobilized the state's national guard to support local law enforcement and protect peaceful demonstrators' rights.
Critics argue that the deployment would be a federal overreach and an attempt to exaggerate isolated episodes of violence to justify military intervention. The prospect of troops being deployed in sub-zero temperatures, which could include soldiers based in Alaska who specialize in cold-weather operations, has raised concerns about the practicality and necessity of such a move.
The situation remains volatile, with local leaders accusing Trump of federal overreach and using violent incidents as an excuse to deploy troops. As tensions continue to escalate, it is unclear whether the deployment will ultimately materialize or if it will be averted through diplomacy.
The Pentagon has ordered approximately 1,500 active-duty soldiers stationed in Alaska to be placed on prepare-to-deploy orders, pending a potential deployment to Minnesota. The state has seen increasingly violent confrontations between residents and federal immigration officers since Renee Good's fatal shooting by an ICE agent last month.
President Donald Trump has threatened to deploy troops under the Insurrection Act if Democratic officials fail to quell protests against his administration's deportation drive. However, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey has dismissed this move as "ridiculous" and warned it would only exacerbate tensions in the city.
According to sources, the deployment of troops is seen as a contingency measure should violence escalate in Minnesota. The state's Hmong community, who are being targeted by ICE agents, have been subjected to raids and intimidation. In one incident, federal agents entered an elderly man's home in St Paul wearing only underwear and a blanket, prompting onlookers to shout for them to leave.
The deployment of troops has sparked fears that the Trump administration is seeking to intimidate local residents into compliance with its deportation policies. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has mobilized the state's national guard to support local law enforcement and protect peaceful demonstrators' rights.
Critics argue that the deployment would be a federal overreach and an attempt to exaggerate isolated episodes of violence to justify military intervention. The prospect of troops being deployed in sub-zero temperatures, which could include soldiers based in Alaska who specialize in cold-weather operations, has raised concerns about the practicality and necessity of such a move.
The situation remains volatile, with local leaders accusing Trump of federal overreach and using violent incidents as an excuse to deploy troops. As tensions continue to escalate, it is unclear whether the deployment will ultimately materialize or if it will be averted through diplomacy.