New York AG James Challenges Trump's Acting US Attorney, Leaving Her Case in Limbo
New York Attorney General Letitia James is fighting a subpoena from federal prosecutors in Albany after claiming that acting U.S. Attorney John Sarcone wasn't properly appointed to his position, according to sources close to the matter. This development comes as part of an ongoing investigation into cases brought against President Donald Trump and the National Rifle Association (NRA) by James.
Sarcone, who has no prior prosecutorial experience, served a 120-day interim term before being appointed as acting U.S. Attorney in Albany. However, his appointment was met with skepticism due to concerns over his lack of qualifications and potential conflicts of interest. Despite this, Sarcone proceeded to subpoena documents from James' office related to these cases.
James, meanwhile, has been accused by Trump of orchestrating a "witch hunt," although she denied the allegations during her recent court appearance in Virginia. The charges against her relate to mortgage fraud, which she claims are politically motivated. Her lawyers have filed a motion challenging her indictment, arguing that prosecutor Lindsey Halligan wasn't properly appointed.
In a similar vein, James' lawyers have also challenged Sarcone's appointment, claiming that he is not validly serving as U.S. Attorney due to irregularities in his appointment process. This move could potentially delay or even block the investigation into cases brought by James against Trump and the NRA.
Experts say that the unconventional appointment process used by President Trump has raised concerns over potential conflicts of interest and erosion of independence within the justice system. A recent California court ruling ruled that an acting U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles couldn't serve as the top prosecutor due to his irregular appointment, citing similar cases involving other prosecutors.
The implications of this latest development are far-reaching, with potential consequences for James' case against Trump and the NRA. As one expert noted, "Both Sarcone and Habba [another unappointed U.S. Attorney] are obviously political players, and they're important to the Trump administration and to the achievement of its goals." The outcome of this challenge remains uncertain, leaving James' cases in limbo until further notice.
New York Attorney General Letitia James is fighting a subpoena from federal prosecutors in Albany after claiming that acting U.S. Attorney John Sarcone wasn't properly appointed to his position, according to sources close to the matter. This development comes as part of an ongoing investigation into cases brought against President Donald Trump and the National Rifle Association (NRA) by James.
Sarcone, who has no prior prosecutorial experience, served a 120-day interim term before being appointed as acting U.S. Attorney in Albany. However, his appointment was met with skepticism due to concerns over his lack of qualifications and potential conflicts of interest. Despite this, Sarcone proceeded to subpoena documents from James' office related to these cases.
James, meanwhile, has been accused by Trump of orchestrating a "witch hunt," although she denied the allegations during her recent court appearance in Virginia. The charges against her relate to mortgage fraud, which she claims are politically motivated. Her lawyers have filed a motion challenging her indictment, arguing that prosecutor Lindsey Halligan wasn't properly appointed.
In a similar vein, James' lawyers have also challenged Sarcone's appointment, claiming that he is not validly serving as U.S. Attorney due to irregularities in his appointment process. This move could potentially delay or even block the investigation into cases brought by James against Trump and the NRA.
Experts say that the unconventional appointment process used by President Trump has raised concerns over potential conflicts of interest and erosion of independence within the justice system. A recent California court ruling ruled that an acting U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles couldn't serve as the top prosecutor due to his irregular appointment, citing similar cases involving other prosecutors.
The implications of this latest development are far-reaching, with potential consequences for James' case against Trump and the NRA. As one expert noted, "Both Sarcone and Habba [another unappointed U.S. Attorney] are obviously political players, and they're important to the Trump administration and to the achievement of its goals." The outcome of this challenge remains uncertain, leaving James' cases in limbo until further notice.
So like the AG is trying to get some documents from Trump's team and Sarcone is all "oh no you can't" because he wasn't properly appointed lol what's going on with these acting US Attorney appointments? Like how can someone just swoop in for 120 days and then suddenly they're valid? It sounds like a total power play to me. And isn't it weird that Sarcone is connected to Trump and the NRA? 
What's the deal with all this? Is it really that important who appoints these people?
. It sounds like a total mess. I mean, who gets appointed as acting U.S. Attorney without any experience? Not exactly the kind of confidence-inspiring leadership you want in a country. And now she's fighting against this appointment and it's putting her whole case into limbo...it's just really frustrating to see how messy politics can get 
. Can't we just have some clear rules about who gets appointed to these positions? This whole thing is just so... complicated 
. It'll be interesting to see how this all plays out 
this is getting so complicated! I think it's really weird that there's all this drama going on with these acting U.S. Attorneys. Like, isn't their main job to follow the law and not get involved in politics? It sounds like they're just pawns in a bigger game 
.
I'm all for transparency and accountability in government, especially when it comes to the justice system. We need our prosecutors to be impartial and independent! 
It feels like we're losing sight of what's really important here.
Only time will tell. But one thing's for sure: this whole situation needs to be kept under scrutiny until we know exactly what's going on. 
the whole thing feels like a big mess, and we should be worried about the impact on our justice system 
Like, calm down, Donald!
.
. And in the end, James' case will probably get tossed out because of these irregularities. Mark my words 
.
she's literally fighting for her rights as a public servant and it's just so admirable! I mean I know some ppl are saying she's being dramatic but I think she has every right to question the legitimacy of John Sarcone's appointment. Like, who gets appointed as U.S. Attorney after only 120 days? It doesn't sound legit to me 
and I'm so glad she's speaking out against it! The whole thing with Trump and the NRA just got even more complicated and I am HERE. FOR. IT 
. If James' lawyers are right, it means she might have to appeal or even go to trial while Sarcone is still technically in charge. That's just a nightmare scenario for her case against Trump. And what about all these other investigations that are gonna get swept under the rug because of some shady appointments? It's like, we need real accountability here