Philippa Langley's Quest for Justice Left in the Shadows of Leicester University's Disregard
It has been 15 years since Philippa Langley embarked on a mission that would change history - to find the remains of King Richard III, the last Plantagenet king of England. Her perseverance and determination were unprecedented, yet her story was all but forgotten when she finally succeeded in locating the monarch's remains.
The Channel 4 documentary "The King in the Car Park" brought Langley's remarkable journey to light, showcasing an amateur who refused to be defined by her lack of credentials. I met her for lunch, and despite frail health and vulnerability, her integrity shone through in every conversation we had about her quest.
When Jeff Pope and I turned this story into a screenplay, "The Lost King", we aimed to give Langley the platform she so rightly deserved. Unfortunately, Leicester University's treatment of her left much to be desired. Richard Taylor, the former deputy registrar at the university, seems to have worked tirelessly behind the scenes to undermine Langley's efforts and silence her story.
In the film, we depicted Taylor as imperfect and sometimes challenging, yet ultimately, he sought to remove any representation of Langley from official records. This is a case of academic integrity compromised by self-interest.
Langley's decision to pursue this impossible task was met with dismissiveness, even ridicule. However, it was she who initiated the search for Richard III and ultimately determined the precise location where his remains were found. When the dig was in peril due to funding withdrawal, Langley raised crucial funds to ensure its survival.
Meanwhile, Richard Taylor's claims of needing a firewall between the university and Langley are suspiciously convenient. It is clear that he sought to erase her contribution from history, silencing any potential criticisms of the university's actions during this tumultuous period.
It is time for accountability. An inquiry into the University of Leicester's behavior would provide an opportunity to examine Taylor's role in erasing Langley's achievements and the motivations behind his efforts.
In contrast, "The Lost King" stands as a testament to Langley's courage and determination. It is available for all to see and serves as a reminder that even the most improbable stories can become the stuff of history with the right voice and platform.
It has been 15 years since Philippa Langley embarked on a mission that would change history - to find the remains of King Richard III, the last Plantagenet king of England. Her perseverance and determination were unprecedented, yet her story was all but forgotten when she finally succeeded in locating the monarch's remains.
The Channel 4 documentary "The King in the Car Park" brought Langley's remarkable journey to light, showcasing an amateur who refused to be defined by her lack of credentials. I met her for lunch, and despite frail health and vulnerability, her integrity shone through in every conversation we had about her quest.
When Jeff Pope and I turned this story into a screenplay, "The Lost King", we aimed to give Langley the platform she so rightly deserved. Unfortunately, Leicester University's treatment of her left much to be desired. Richard Taylor, the former deputy registrar at the university, seems to have worked tirelessly behind the scenes to undermine Langley's efforts and silence her story.
In the film, we depicted Taylor as imperfect and sometimes challenging, yet ultimately, he sought to remove any representation of Langley from official records. This is a case of academic integrity compromised by self-interest.
Langley's decision to pursue this impossible task was met with dismissiveness, even ridicule. However, it was she who initiated the search for Richard III and ultimately determined the precise location where his remains were found. When the dig was in peril due to funding withdrawal, Langley raised crucial funds to ensure its survival.
Meanwhile, Richard Taylor's claims of needing a firewall between the university and Langley are suspiciously convenient. It is clear that he sought to erase her contribution from history, silencing any potential criticisms of the university's actions during this tumultuous period.
It is time for accountability. An inquiry into the University of Leicester's behavior would provide an opportunity to examine Taylor's role in erasing Langley's achievements and the motivations behind his efforts.
In contrast, "The Lost King" stands as a testament to Langley's courage and determination. It is available for all to see and serves as a reminder that even the most improbable stories can become the stuff of history with the right voice and platform.