Manchester United's managerial succession plan has been a farcical affair, with the club hierarchy seemingly content to stick their fingers in the air and hope for the best. The appointment of Darren Fletcher as pre-interim boss, followed by the rumoured consideration of Ole Gunnar Solskjær or Michael Carrick for a longer-term role, has all the hallmarks of a team that is still searching for its identity.
The decision to put Fletcher in charge under advisement from Sir Alex Ferguson raises more questions than answers. Was this simply a case of nostalgia, an attempt to cling to the past and recapture some of the magic that defined United's dominance during Ferguson's tenure? Or was it a genuine attempt to bring back the old guard and steer the team towards success?
The appointment of Carrick as interim manager is perhaps more understandable, given his extensive experience at the club. However, this decision too seems to be driven by sentiment rather than logic. The fact that United are considering one of their own - albeit a somewhat unorthodox choice - suggests that the club's top brass may not have fully considered the potential pitfalls of appointing an interim boss who has never managed in charge before.
The problem with Manchester United's approach is that they seem to be stuck in the past, relying on nostalgic name-checks and crowd-pleasing appointments rather than putting in place a coherent plan for the future. This is reminiscent of the Seinfeld episode "The Opposite," where George Costanza decides to do the opposite of his instincts and habits in order to achieve success.
Unfortunately, it appears that United's leadership are failing to learn from the lessons of their own history. Instead of embracing change and innovation, they seem content to cling to a bygone era and hope that things will magically come right. As a result, the team is doomed to repeat the same mistakes that have plagued them for so long.
It's not clear whether Carrick's appointment will be enough to turn United's season around, but one thing is certain - it won't be solved through nostalgia alone. The club needs to take a hard look at its future and come up with a coherent plan of action, rather than relying on crowd-pleasing appointments and sentimental gestures.
The decision to put Fletcher in charge under advisement from Sir Alex Ferguson raises more questions than answers. Was this simply a case of nostalgia, an attempt to cling to the past and recapture some of the magic that defined United's dominance during Ferguson's tenure? Or was it a genuine attempt to bring back the old guard and steer the team towards success?
The appointment of Carrick as interim manager is perhaps more understandable, given his extensive experience at the club. However, this decision too seems to be driven by sentiment rather than logic. The fact that United are considering one of their own - albeit a somewhat unorthodox choice - suggests that the club's top brass may not have fully considered the potential pitfalls of appointing an interim boss who has never managed in charge before.
The problem with Manchester United's approach is that they seem to be stuck in the past, relying on nostalgic name-checks and crowd-pleasing appointments rather than putting in place a coherent plan for the future. This is reminiscent of the Seinfeld episode "The Opposite," where George Costanza decides to do the opposite of his instincts and habits in order to achieve success.
Unfortunately, it appears that United's leadership are failing to learn from the lessons of their own history. Instead of embracing change and innovation, they seem content to cling to a bygone era and hope that things will magically come right. As a result, the team is doomed to repeat the same mistakes that have plagued them for so long.
It's not clear whether Carrick's appointment will be enough to turn United's season around, but one thing is certain - it won't be solved through nostalgia alone. The club needs to take a hard look at its future and come up with a coherent plan of action, rather than relying on crowd-pleasing appointments and sentimental gestures.
I feel like Manchester United's approach to finding their new manager is really all over the place right now... it's like they're trying to recapture the past instead of looking towards the future 
. They've got some great players on the team, but if they don't figure out a way to work together and play a cohesive game, we'll be seeing more losses at Old Trafford 
. I'm not sure what's going on behind the scenes, but it seems like the club is stuck in a rut 
. They need to get their heads back in the game and start thinking about what it takes to succeed in today's football world 
.
. They're literally saying "let's make someone just because they used to be good" 
. Newsflash: being good in the past doesn't automatically mean you'll be good now. And who is Darren Fletcher again? Sounds like a placeholder to me 
. I mean what's next, bringing back the old school team chants and jerseys? Come on Manchester United, get with the times or just give up 
I mean, I get it that they want to bring back some old guard vibes but can't they just find someone who's actually good at managing a team? It feels like they're trying too hard to recapture the past instead of looking towards the future. Like, yeah, Ole Gunnar Solskjær is cool and all but shouldn't he be in charge or something? 
. It feels like they're just throwing darts at a board and hoping one sticks. Darren Fletcher as pre-interim boss? That's like me showing up to work wearing my PJs 
.