"WHO Urged to Swap Surgical Face Masks with Respirators Amid Growing Concerns Over Inadequate Protection"
The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing mounting pressure from experts to update its guidelines on personal protective equipment for healthcare workers, recommending the use of respirator-level masks instead of surgical face masks. The call comes after a growing body of evidence suggesting that these latter masks provide inadequate protection against airborne pathogens, including COVID-19.
Critics argue that surgical face masks are "obsolete" and should be phased out in favor of respirators, which offer significantly higher levels of filtration, often exceeding 90% in certain cases. The current use of surgical masks is seen as a barrier to effective infection control and has been linked to increased transmission rates among healthcare workers.
The proposal has been endorsed by over 2,000 members of the public, including vulnerable patients, as well as senior clinicians and researchers. It has also received support from prominent figures such as George Monbiot, a Guardian columnist, and Eric Feigl-Ding, a US epidemiologist.
According to Prof Adam Finkel, one of the letter's authors, surgical masks are "invented" to prevent doctors and nurses from sneezing into patients' airways, rather than designed to stop airborne pathogens. He likened this to comparing an outdated typewriter to a modern computer β the latter offers significantly more functionality and efficiency.
The WHO has faced criticism for being slow to recognize COVID-19 as spreading through airborne particles. The proposed update would also require the organization to revisit earlier statements on the mode of transmission, with experts arguing that unambiguous information is necessary to inform the public.
While the proposal may spark controversy, its supporters argue that adopting respirators in healthcare settings could significantly reduce infections and related risks for patients and healthcare workers alike.
The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing mounting pressure from experts to update its guidelines on personal protective equipment for healthcare workers, recommending the use of respirator-level masks instead of surgical face masks. The call comes after a growing body of evidence suggesting that these latter masks provide inadequate protection against airborne pathogens, including COVID-19.
Critics argue that surgical face masks are "obsolete" and should be phased out in favor of respirators, which offer significantly higher levels of filtration, often exceeding 90% in certain cases. The current use of surgical masks is seen as a barrier to effective infection control and has been linked to increased transmission rates among healthcare workers.
The proposal has been endorsed by over 2,000 members of the public, including vulnerable patients, as well as senior clinicians and researchers. It has also received support from prominent figures such as George Monbiot, a Guardian columnist, and Eric Feigl-Ding, a US epidemiologist.
According to Prof Adam Finkel, one of the letter's authors, surgical masks are "invented" to prevent doctors and nurses from sneezing into patients' airways, rather than designed to stop airborne pathogens. He likened this to comparing an outdated typewriter to a modern computer β the latter offers significantly more functionality and efficiency.
The WHO has faced criticism for being slow to recognize COVID-19 as spreading through airborne particles. The proposed update would also require the organization to revisit earlier statements on the mode of transmission, with experts arguing that unambiguous information is necessary to inform the public.
While the proposal may spark controversy, its supporters argue that adopting respirators in healthcare settings could significantly reduce infections and related risks for patients and healthcare workers alike.