Luxembourg's top court has issued a ruling that could shake up the European drinks industry: non-alcoholic beverages cannot be labeled as "gin". The Luxembourg-based judges have ruled that only spirit drinks with at least 37.5% alcohol by volume, flavored with juniper berries, can bear the term "gin".
The decision comes after a German association brought a case against PB Vi Goods, a company selling a non-alcoholic drink called Virgin Gin Alkoholfrei. The German court initially ruled in favor of the company, stating that the name was self-explanatory and would not deceive consumers. However, the Luxembourg judges have overturned this decision, citing EU law as clear on the matter.
The ruling is a significant blow to the EU's fast-growing non-alcoholic drinks market, which has seen considerable growth in recent years. The court's reasoning suggests that the term "non-alcoholic gin" would be perceived as inconsistent with traditional understandings of the spirit drink.
This decision follows in the footsteps of previous EU court rulings on food labeling and trademark disputes. In 2018, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled against the makers of KitKats, who had sought to trademark their distinctive four-fingered wafer shape. Last year, the ECJ clarified that only animal-derived products can use terms such as "milk", "butter", and "yogurt".
The EU's efforts to tighten food labeling rules have been ongoing for some time, with recent votes aimed at banning certain terms used on plant-based foods. While veggie burgers and tofu steaks may still be an option in some member states, the ruling against non-alcoholic gin serves as a reminder of the EU's strict regulations when it comes to labeling spirits.
As the European drinks industry adjusts to this new ruling, producers of non-alcoholic beverages are likely to face significant challenges. The loss of the "gin" label could be a major setback for companies seeking to tap into the growing demand for low- and no-alcohol alternatives.
The decision comes after a German association brought a case against PB Vi Goods, a company selling a non-alcoholic drink called Virgin Gin Alkoholfrei. The German court initially ruled in favor of the company, stating that the name was self-explanatory and would not deceive consumers. However, the Luxembourg judges have overturned this decision, citing EU law as clear on the matter.
The ruling is a significant blow to the EU's fast-growing non-alcoholic drinks market, which has seen considerable growth in recent years. The court's reasoning suggests that the term "non-alcoholic gin" would be perceived as inconsistent with traditional understandings of the spirit drink.
This decision follows in the footsteps of previous EU court rulings on food labeling and trademark disputes. In 2018, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled against the makers of KitKats, who had sought to trademark their distinctive four-fingered wafer shape. Last year, the ECJ clarified that only animal-derived products can use terms such as "milk", "butter", and "yogurt".
The EU's efforts to tighten food labeling rules have been ongoing for some time, with recent votes aimed at banning certain terms used on plant-based foods. While veggie burgers and tofu steaks may still be an option in some member states, the ruling against non-alcoholic gin serves as a reminder of the EU's strict regulations when it comes to labeling spirits.
As the European drinks industry adjusts to this new ruling, producers of non-alcoholic beverages are likely to face significant challenges. The loss of the "gin" label could be a major setback for companies seeking to tap into the growing demand for low- and no-alcohol alternatives.