The President of the United States, Donald Trump, has unwittingly become America's first generative AI president. The evidence of this phenomenon is evident in his social media posts - a plethora of videos showcasing the president in various absurd scenarios, ranging from wearing a crown while piloting a fighter jet to dropping pixels on fictionalized protesters in Times Square.
The question remains: how do these AI-generated videos end up on Trump's official account? The answer lies in the White House's unorthodox approach to content management. According to a senior White House official, the president often comes across videos that amuse him and saves them to his camera roll. However, it is his staffers who ultimately identify and approve these clips for posting.
The role of Dan Scavino, a longtime Trump adviser, and Natalie Harp, a key Trump aide referred to as "the human printer," is pivotal in executing the president's social media posts. They are responsible for physically posting content on Truth Social, which has become the platform of choice for the administration's online presence.
The use of generative AI videos by Trump has brought the nation into new territory, raising concerns about the potential risks and consequences of such technology. While deepfakes were once feared for their Machiavellian potential, these videos are more akin to a sideshow, blurring the lines between truth and fiction without any apparent strategy or intent beyond trolling and mockery.
Trump's descent into AI-generated content is a stark reminder of his tendency to misinterpret information from news sources. He has repeatedly mistaken B-roll footage with real conditions on the ground. The use of generative AI videos by Trump raises questions about what could go wrong, especially given the aging president's propensity for mistakes and the administration's apparent lack of strategy in addressing these issues.
In conclusion, Trump's reliance on AI-generated content has raised concerns about the impact on democracy and the potential consequences of such technology. As experts warned years ago, deepfake videos pose a significant threat to our democracy, and Trump's use of generative AI videos is a stark reminder that this threat remains very much alive.
The question remains: how do these AI-generated videos end up on Trump's official account? The answer lies in the White House's unorthodox approach to content management. According to a senior White House official, the president often comes across videos that amuse him and saves them to his camera roll. However, it is his staffers who ultimately identify and approve these clips for posting.
The role of Dan Scavino, a longtime Trump adviser, and Natalie Harp, a key Trump aide referred to as "the human printer," is pivotal in executing the president's social media posts. They are responsible for physically posting content on Truth Social, which has become the platform of choice for the administration's online presence.
The use of generative AI videos by Trump has brought the nation into new territory, raising concerns about the potential risks and consequences of such technology. While deepfakes were once feared for their Machiavellian potential, these videos are more akin to a sideshow, blurring the lines between truth and fiction without any apparent strategy or intent beyond trolling and mockery.
Trump's descent into AI-generated content is a stark reminder of his tendency to misinterpret information from news sources. He has repeatedly mistaken B-roll footage with real conditions on the ground. The use of generative AI videos by Trump raises questions about what could go wrong, especially given the aging president's propensity for mistakes and the administration's apparent lack of strategy in addressing these issues.
In conclusion, Trump's reliance on AI-generated content has raised concerns about the impact on democracy and the potential consequences of such technology. As experts warned years ago, deepfake videos pose a significant threat to our democracy, and Trump's use of generative AI videos is a stark reminder that this threat remains very much alive.