I think it's kinda rich that Trump's lawyers are worried about a "circus-like atmosphere" but they're not complaining when he's doing his thing 
. Meanwhile, the public has every right to know what's going on, especially since this dude is being indicted and potentially put on trial. It's not like he's above the law, you know? If CNN can't get some basic access to the arraignment, who's gonna hold him accountable for whatever it is he did wrong? The media outlets are just trying to report on a public figure doing their job, but Trump's team is over here playing lawyer and trying to spin this into something dramatic 
. I think the judge should make an example of himself, though – allow some cameras in so we can see what kind of theatrics he's going to pull 
.
. Meanwhile, the public has every right to know what's going on, especially since this dude is being indicted and potentially put on trial. It's not like he's above the law, you know? If CNN can't get some basic access to the arraignment, who's gonna hold him accountable for whatever it is he did wrong? The media outlets are just trying to report on a public figure doing their job, but Trump's team is over here playing lawyer and trying to spin this into something dramatic . I think the judge should make an example of himself, though – allow some cameras in so we can see what kind of theatrics he's going to pull .
It's like they're trying to control the narrative or something. But at the same time, I can understand why they'd want to avoid a total circus atmosphere. I've been following this case for ages and it's already getting pretty intense.
. The suspense is killing me!
. And now they're trying to limit cameras because of security concerns? That seems like a pretty thin excuse to me 
. Plus, it's not like the Secret Service doesn't already have its hands full with protecting Trump all the time 
.
I'm kinda interested in how they're gonna handle this arraignment... it feels like a big circus already with the whole Trump thing going on. I don't know if security concerns are legit or not, but I get why they wanna keep cameras out. What's up with the DA's office though? 
. I think it's totally reasonable for the media to want to cover this important event, especially since Trump is facing charges. The whole thing does raise some interesting questions about security and public access, though 
. Maybe the judge will figure out a way to strike a balance between keeping things safe and giving the public a glimpse into what's going on. Fingers crossed! 
cameras should be allowed at arraignment 
security can handle it, judge gotta show some transparency 